Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase 1 study of pandemic H1 DNA vaccine in healthy adults.
Crank, Michelle C; Gordon, Ingelise J; Yamshchikov, Galina V; Sitar, Sandra; Hu, Zonghui; Enama, Mary E; Holman, LaSonji A; Bailer, Robert T; Pearce, Melissa B; Koup, Richard A; Mascola, John R; Nabel, Gary J; Tumpey, Terrence M; Schwartz, Richard M; Graham, Barney S; Ledgerwood, Julie E.
Affiliation
  • Crank MC; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Gordon IJ; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Yamshchikov GV; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Sitar S; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Hu Z; Biostatistics Research Branch, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Enama ME; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Holman LA; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Bailer RT; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Pearce MB; Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Koup RA; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Mascola JR; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Nabel GJ; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Tumpey TM; Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Schwartz RM; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Graham BS; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Ledgerwood JE; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 10(4): e0123969, 2015.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25884189
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A novel, swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus was detected worldwide in April 2009, and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global pandemic that June. DNA vaccine priming improves responses to inactivated influenza vaccines. We describe the rapid production and clinical evaluation of a DNA vaccine encoding the hemagglutinin protein of the 2009 pandemic A/California/04/2009(H1N1) influenza virus, accomplished nearly two months faster than production of A/California/07/2009(H1N1) licensed monovalent inactivated vaccine (MIV).

METHODS:

20 subjects received three H1 DNA vaccinations (4 mg intramuscularly with Biojector) at 4-week intervals. Eighteen subjects received an optional boost when the licensed H1N1 MIV became available. The interval between the third H1 DNA injection and MIV boost was 3-17 weeks. Vaccine safety was assessed by clinical observation, laboratory parameters, and 7-day solicited reactogenicity. Antibody responses were assessed by ELISA, HAI and neutralization assays, and T cell responses by ELISpot and flow cytometry.

RESULTS:

Vaccinations were safe and well-tolerated. As evaluated by HAI, 6/20 developed positive responses at 4 weeks after third DNA injection and 13/18 at 4 weeks after MIV boost. Similar results were detected in neutralization assays. T cell responses were detected after DNA and MIV. The antibody responses were significantly amplified by the MIV boost, however, the boost did not increased T cell responses induced by DNA vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS:

H1 DNA vaccine was produced quickly, was well-tolerated, and had modest immunogenicity as a single agent. Other HA DNA prime-MIV boost regimens utilizing one DNA prime vaccination and longer boost intervals have shown significant immunogenicity. Rapid and large-scale production of HA DNA vaccines has the potential to contribute to an efficient response against future influenza pandemics. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00973895.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Vaccines, DNA / Influenza, Human / Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Vaccines, DNA / Influenza, Human / Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States