Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Barber, Claire E; Patel, Jatin N; Woodhouse, Linda; Smith, Christopher; Weiss, Stephen; Homik, Joanne; LeClercq, Sharon; Mosher, Dianne; Christiansen, Tanya; Howden, Jane Squire; Wasylak, Tracy; Greenwood-Lee, James; Emrick, Andrea; Suter, Esther; Kathol, Barb; Khodyakov, Dmitry; Grant, Sean; Campbell-Scherer, Denise; Phillips, Leah; Hendricks, Jennifer; Marshall, Deborah A.
Affiliation
  • Barber CE; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC Room 3AA20, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada. cehbarbe@ucalgary.ca.
  • Patel JN; Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada. jpatel@albertaboneandjoint.com.
  • Woodhouse L; Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. linda.woodhouse@ualberta.ca.
  • Smith C; Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada. csmith@albertaboneandjoint.com.
  • Weiss S; Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada. sweiss@albertaboneandjoint.com.
  • Homik J; Arthritis Working Group, Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network, Calgary and Edmonton, AB, Canada. jhomik@ualberta.ca.
  • LeClercq S; Division of Rheumatology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. jhomik@ualberta.ca.
  • Mosher D; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC Room 3AA20, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada. sharon.leclercq@albertahealthservices.ca.
  • Christiansen T; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC Room 3AA20, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada. dpmosher@ucalgary.ca.
  • Howden JS; Arthritis Working Group, Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network, Calgary and Edmonton, AB, Canada. dpmosher@ucalgary.ca.
  • Wasylak T; Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, AB, Canada. tanya.c@orthosurgeons.ca.
  • Greenwood-Lee J; Edmonton Musculoskeletal Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada. jsquire@edmontonmsk.ca.
  • Emrick A; Hip and Knee Working Group, Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network, Calgary and Edmonton, AB, Canada. jsquire@edmontonmsk.ca.
  • Suter E; Strategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada. tracy.wasylak@albertahealthservices.ca.
  • Kathol B; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. jameslee@ucalgary.ca.
  • Khodyakov D; Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada. aemrick@albertaboneandjoint.com.
  • Grant S; Workforce Research and Evaluation, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada. esther.suter@albertahealthservices.ca.
  • Campbell-Scherer D; Foothills Medical Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada. barb.kathol@albertahealthservices.ca.
  • Phillips L; The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA. dkhodyak@rand.org.
  • Hendricks J; The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA. sgrant@rand.org.
  • Marshall DA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. dlcampbe@ualberta.ca.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 17: 322, 2015 Nov 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26568556
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Centralized intake is integral to healthcare systems to support timely access to appropriate health services. The aim of this study was to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate centralized intake systems for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS:

Phase 1 involved stakeholder meetings including healthcare providers, managers, researchers and patients to obtain input on candidate KPIs, aligned along six quality dimensions appropriateness, accessibility, acceptability, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. Phase 2 involved literature reviews to ensure KPIs were based on best practices and harmonized with existing measures. Phase 3 involved a three-round, online modified Delphi panel to finalize the KPIs. The panel consisted of two rounds of rating and a round of online and in-person discussions. KPIs rated as valid and important (≥7 on a 9-point Likert scale) were included in the final set.

RESULTS:

Twenty-five KPIs identified and substantiated during Phases 1 and 2 were submitted to 27 panellists including healthcare providers, managers, researchers, and patients in Phase 3. After the in-person meeting, three KPIs were removed and six were suggested. The final set includes 9 OA KPIs, 10 RA KPIs and 9 relating to centralized intake processes for both conditions. All 28 KPIs were rated as valid and important.

CONCLUSIONS:

Arthritis stakeholders have proposed 28 KPIs that should be used in quality improvement efforts when evaluating centralized intake for OA and RA. The KPIs measure five of the six dimensions of quality and are relevant to patients, practitioners and health systems.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Osteoarthritis / Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Delphi Technique / Patient Satisfaction / Quality Indicators, Health Care Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Journal subject: REUMATOLOGIA Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Osteoarthritis / Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Delphi Technique / Patient Satisfaction / Quality Indicators, Health Care Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Journal subject: REUMATOLOGIA Year: 2015 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada