Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices: focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols.
Horwood, Laura; Attili, Anil; Luba, Frank; Ibrahim, El-Sayed H; Parmar, Hemant; Stojanovska, Jadranka; Gadoth-Goodman, Sharon; Fette, Carey; Oral, Hakan; Bogun, Frank.
Affiliation
  • Horwood L; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC 5853, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5853, USA.
  • Attili A; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Luba F; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Ibrahim EH; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Parmar H; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Stojanovska J; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Gadoth-Goodman S; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC 5853, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5853, USA.
  • Fette C; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC 5853, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5853, USA.
  • Oral H; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC 5853, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5853, USA.
  • Bogun F; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC 5853, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5853, USA.
Europace ; 19(5): 812-817, 2017 May 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27256419
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to be safe in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) provided a specific protocol is followed. The objective of this study was to assess whether this is also true for patients excluded from published protocols. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

A total of 160 MRIs were obtained in 142 consecutive patients with CIEDs [106 patients had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and 36 had a pacemaker implanted] using an adapted, pre-specified protocol. A cardiac MRI was performed in 95 patients, and a spinal/brain MRI was performed in 47 patients. Forty-six patients (32%) had either abandoned leads (n = 10), and/or were pacemaker dependent with an implanted ICD (n = 19), had recently implanted CIEDs (n = 1), and/or had a CIED device with battery depletion (n = 2), and/or a component of the CIED was recalled or on advisory (n = 32). No major complications occurred. Some device parameters changed slightly, but significantly, right after or at 1-week post-MRI without requiring any reprogramming. In one patient with an ICD on advisory, the pacing rate changed inexplicably during one of his two MRIs from 90 to 50 b.p.m.

CONCLUSION:

Using a pre-specified protocol, cardiac and non-cardiac MRIs were performed in CIED patients with pacemaker dependency, abandoned leads, or depleted batteries without occurrence of major adverse events. Patients with devices on advisory need to be monitored carefully during MRI, especially if they are pacemaker dependent.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Burns, Electric / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Foreign-Body Reaction / Defibrillators, Implantable / Equipment Failure / Contraindications Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Europace Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Burns, Electric / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Foreign-Body Reaction / Defibrillators, Implantable / Equipment Failure / Contraindications Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Europace Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States