Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Healing Progress of Pressure Ulcers Treated with Cathodal High-Voltage Monophasic Pulsed Current: Results of a Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Polak, Anna; Kloth, Luther C; Blaszczak, Edward; Taradaj, Jakub; Nawrat-Szoltysik, Agnieszka; Walczak, Anna; Bialek, Lidia; Paczula, Malgorzata; Franek, Andrzej; Kucio, Cezary.
Affiliation
  • Polak A; Anna Polak, PhD, PT, is a Physiotherapist and Specialist in Wound Healing and Geriatric Physical Therapies, and a Senior Lecturer, Department of Physical Therapy, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, and the Medical Science Institute, Katowice School of Economics in Katowice, Poland. Luther C. Kloth, MS, PT, is an Emeritus Professor of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and a Licensed Physical Therapist and Certified Wound Specialist, American Academy of Wound Ma
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 29(10): 447-59, 2016 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27632442
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of high-voltage monophasic pulsed current (HVMPC) as an adjunct to a standard wound care for the treatment of Stage II and III pressure ulcers (PrUs). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study. SETTING: Two nursing and care centers. PATIENTS: Patients with PrUs that did not respond to previous treatment for at least 4 weeks were randomly assigned to the electrical stimulation (ES) group (25 patients; mean age of 79.92 ± 8.50 years; mean wound surface area [WSA] of 10.58 ± 10.57 cm) or to the control group (24 patients; mean age of 76.33 ± 12.74 years; mean WSA of 9.71 ± 6.70 cm). INTERVENTIONS: Both the ES and control groups received standard wound care and respectively, cathodal HVMPC (154 microseconds; 100 pulses per second; 0.24 A; 250 µ/s) applied continuously for 50 minutes once a day, 5 times a week, or sham HVMPC. MAIN OUTCOME: Percentage area reduction over 6 weeks of intervention. MAIN RESULTS: In the ES group, there was a statistically significant decrease in WSA after 1 week of treatment (35% ± 30.5%) compared with 17.07% ± 34.13% in the control group (P = .032). After treatment, at week 6, percentage area reduction in the ES group was 80.31% ± 29.02% versus 54.65% ± 42.65% in the control group (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: Cathodal HVMPC reduces the WSA of Stage II and III PrUs. The results are consistent with the results of other researchers who used HVMPC to treat PrUs.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wound Healing / Electric Stimulation Therapy / Pressure Ulcer Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Adv Skin Wound Care Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM Year: 2016 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wound Healing / Electric Stimulation Therapy / Pressure Ulcer Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Adv Skin Wound Care Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM Year: 2016 Type: Article