Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lead extraction with high frequency laser sheaths: a single-centre experience.
Pecha, Simon; Linder, Matthias; Gosau, Nils; Castro, Liesa; Vogler, Julia; Willems, Stephan; Reichenspurner, Hermann; Hakmi, Samer.
Affiliation
  • Pecha S; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Linder M; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Gosau N; Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Castro L; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Vogler J; Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Willems S; Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Reichenspurner H; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Hakmi S; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 51(5): 902-905, 2017 May 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28137751
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Extraction of chronically implanted cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices leads can be difficult. Excimer laser-assisted extraction with 40 Hz sheaths has shown good results in challenging cases. In 2012, a new 80 Hz high-frequency laser sheath became available that delivers twice as many pulses per second. Here, we report our clinical experience with the new GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheath.

METHODS:

Between January 2012 and August 2016, 292 leads were treated in 151 patients using 80 Hz GlideLight laser sheath. Lead extraction indications included systemic infection or lead endocarditis n = 35 (23.2%), local infection n = 73 (48.3%), lead dysfunction n = 32 (21.2%), system upgrade n = 5 (3.3%), tricuspid regurgitation n = 3 (2.0%) and other indications n = 3 (2.0). All patient-related and procedural data were collected into a database and analysed.

RESULTS:

Mean patient's age was 66.2 ± 14.4 years, 73.5% were male. Ninety-one (31.2%) atrial, 159 (54.4%) ventricular and 42 (14.4%) coronary sinus leads had to be extracted. The mean time from initial lead implantation was 98.0 ± 65.2 months. Mean laser treatment time was 67.5 ± 71.3 s, mean laser pulses delivered were 5130 ± 6592. Clinical success was achieved in 99.3% of the cases, while complete procedural success was observed in 96.7%. A failure of extraction was seen in 2 (1.3%) patients. An overall complication rate of 2.0%, including two major (1.3%) and one minor (0.7%) complications, was observed. No periprocedural mortality was seen.

CONCLUSIONS:

The new GlideLight high-frequency laser sheath allows for a high safety and efficacy in extraction of chronically implanted pacemaker- and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Device Removal Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Device Removal Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany