Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current and potential providers of blood pressure self-screening: a mixed methods study in Oxfordshire.
Tompson, A C; Fleming, S G; Heneghan, C J; McManus, R J; Greenfield, S M; Hobbs, F D R; Ward, A M.
Affiliation
  • Tompson AC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Fleming SG; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Heneghan CJ; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • McManus RJ; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Greenfield SM; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Hobbs FD; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Ward AM; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open ; 7(3): e013938, 2017 03 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28336742
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To (1) establish the extent of opportunities for members of the public to check their own blood pressure (BP) outside of healthcare consultations (BP self-screening), (2) investigate the reasons for and against hosting such a service and (3) ascertain how BP self-screening data are used in primary care.

DESIGN:

A mixed methods, cross-sectional study.

SETTING:

Primary care and community locations in Oxfordshire, UK.

PARTICIPANTS:

325 sites were surveyed to identify where and in what form BP self-screening services were available. 23 semistructured interviews were then completed with current and potential hosts of BP self-screening services.

RESULTS:

18/82 (22%) general practices offered BP self-screening and 68/110 (62%) pharmacies offered professional-led BP screening. There was no evidence of permanent BP self-screening activities in other community settings.Healthcare professionals, managers, community workers and leaders were interviewed. Those in primary care generally felt that practice-based BP self-screening was a beneficial activity that increased the attainment of performance targets although there was variation in its perceived usefulness for patient care. The pharmacists interviewed provided BP checking as a service to the community but were unable to develop self-screening services without a clear business plan. Among potential hosts, barriers to providing a BP self-screening service included a perceived lack of healthcare commissioner and public demand, and a weak-if any-link to their core objectives as an organisation.

CONCLUSIONS:

BP self-screening currently occurs in a minority of general practices. Any future development of community BP self-screening programmes will require (1) public promotion and (2) careful consideration of how best to support-and reward-the community hosts who currently perceive little if any benefit.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Self Care / Blood Pressure Determination / Health Care Surveys Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Self Care / Blood Pressure Determination / Health Care Surveys Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom