Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Large gene panel sequencing in clinical diagnostics-results from 501 consecutive cases.
Pajusalu, S; Kahre, T; Roomere, H; Murumets, Ü; Roht, L; Simenson, K; Reimand, T; Õunap, K.
Affiliation
  • Pajusalu S; Department of Clinical Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Kahre T; Department of Clinical Genetics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Roomere H; Department of Clinical Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Murumets Ü; Department of Clinical Genetics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Roht L; Department of Clinical Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Simenson K; Department of Clinical Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Reimand T; Department of Clinical Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Õunap K; Department of Clinical Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Clin Genet ; 93(1): 78-83, 2018 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28378410
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In addition to whole exomes, large gene panels of clinically associated genes are used as high-throughput sequencing tests in many clinical centers, but their clinical utility has been much less investigated. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Here we report the results of the 501 first unselected cases for whom TruSight One panel (Illumina Inc., San Diego, California) was sequenced as a clinical diagnostic test for a variety of indications in our department. The analysis was restricted to virtual subpanels based on referral forms, where doctors were asked to list candidate genes or select one from predefined larger panels.

RESULTS:

A probable or definite pathogenic finding was reported in 26.3% of cases. In 238 samples for whom 1 to 9 genes were requested for analysis, the diagnostic yield was significantly higher compared to other 263 cases for whom larger subpanels were requested (31.5% vs 21.7%, respectively, P = .016). Detected mutations included single nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, and larger copy number variants. Out of 157 reported mutations, 67 were previously undescribed.

CONCLUSION:

The clinical utility of large gene panel sequencing in the context of other genetic diagnostic tests is discussed in detail.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genetic Predisposition to Disease / High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / Exome / Mutation Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Language: En Journal: Clin Genet Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Estonia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genetic Predisposition to Disease / High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / Exome / Mutation Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Language: En Journal: Clin Genet Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Estonia