Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer.
Blackwell, K; Gascon, P; Jones, C M; Nixon, A; Krendyukov, A; Nakov, R; Li, Y; Harbeck, N.
Affiliation
  • Blackwell K; Department of Oncology, Duke University, DUMC, Durham, USA.
  • Gascon P; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Jones CM; Jones Clinic, Germantown.
  • Nixon A; Fowler Family Center for Cancer Care, Jonesboro, USA.
  • Krendyukov A; Hexal AG, Holzkirchen/Oberhaching, Germany.
  • Nakov R; Hexal AG, Holzkirchen/Oberhaching, Germany.
  • Li Y; Sandoz Inc., Princeton, USA.
  • Harbeck N; Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and CCCLMU, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Ann Oncol ; 28(9): 2272-2277, 2017 Sep 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28637287
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Following the functional and physicochemical characterization of a proposed biosimilar, comparative clinical studies help to confirm biosimilarity by demonstrating similar safety and efficacy to the reference product in a sensitive patient population. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

LA-EP2006 is a proposed biosimilar that has been developed for pegfilgrastim, a long-acting form of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the prevention of neutropenia. The current analysis reports data pooled from two independent, multinational, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind phase III studies of similar design comparing the safety and efficacy of reference pegfilgrastim with LA-EP2006 in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic (neo)adjuvant TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy and requiring granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

RESULTS:

A total of 624 patients were randomized in the PROTECT-1 and PROTECT-2 studies (NCT01735175; NCT01516736) (LA-EP2006 n = 314; reference n = 310). Baseline characteristics of patients were well balanced across treatment groups. The primary end point, mean duration of severe neutropenia in the first chemotherapy cycle was similar in both the LA-EP2006 and reference groups (1.05 ± 1.055 days versus 1.01 ± 0.958 days), with a treatment difference of - 0.04 days [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.19 to 0.11] that met the equivalence criteria (the 95% CI were within the defined margin of ±1 day). Secondary end points, such as the nadir of absolute neutrophil count and the incidence of febrile neutropenia, were also similar between LA-EP2006 and reference pegfilgrastim. The safety and tolerability profile of LA-EP2006 was similar to that observed with reference pegfilgrastim, and there were no reports of neutralizing antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS:

This pooled analysis confirms, as a part of totality of evidence approach, that the proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim LA-EP2006 has a comparable efficacy and safety profile to reference pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving TAC chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS NCT01735175 and NCT01516736.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polyethylene Glycols / Breast Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals / Filgrastim / Neutropenia Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polyethylene Glycols / Breast Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals / Filgrastim / Neutropenia Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States