Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bias in image analysis and its solution: unbiased stereology.
Brown, Danielle L.
Affiliation
  • Brown DL; Charles River Laboratories, Pathology Associates, 4025 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 150, Durham, NC 27703, USA.
J Toxicol Pathol ; 30(3): 183-191, 2017 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28798525
Although the human eye is excellent for pattern recognition, it often lacks the sensitivity to detect subtle changes in particle density. Because of this, quantitative evaluation may be required in some studies. A common type of quantitative assessment used for routine toxicology studies is two-dimensional histomorphometry. Although this technique can provide additional information about the tissue section being examined, it does not give information about the tissue as a whole. Furthermore, it produces biased (inaccurate) data that does not take into account the size, shape, or orientation of particles. In contrast, stereology is a technique that utilizes stringent sampling methods to obtain three-dimensional information about the entire tissue that is unbiased. The purpose of this review is to illuminate the sources of bias with two-dimensional morphometry, how it can affect the data, and how that bias is minimized with stereology.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Toxicol Pathol Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Toxicol Pathol Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States