Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determining gestational age and preterm birth in rural Guatemala: A comparison of methods.
Weinstein, John R; Thompson, Lisa M; Díaz Artiga, Anaité; Bryan, Joe P; Arriaga, William E; Omer, Saad B; McCracken, John P.
Affiliation
  • Weinstein JR; School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
  • Thompson LM; School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
  • Díaz Artiga A; Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
  • Bryan JP; Central American Regional Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
  • Arriaga WE; Division of Global Health Protection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Omer SB; Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social, Quetzaltenango, Guatemala.
  • McCracken JP; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 13(3): e0193666, 2018.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29554145
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Preterm birth is the leading cause of death among children <5 years of age. Accurate determination of prematurity is necessary to provide appropriate neonatal care and guide preventive measures. To estimate the most accurate method to identify infants at risk for adverse outcomes, we assessed the validity of two widely available methods-last menstrual period (LMP) and the New Ballard (NB) neonatal assessment-against ultrasound in determining gestational age and preterm birth in highland Guatemala.

METHODS:

Pregnant women (n = 188) were recruited with a gestational age <20 weeks and followed until delivery. Ultrasound was performed by trained physicians and LMP was collected during recruitment. NB was performed on infants within 96 hours of birth by trained study nurses. LMP and NB accuracy at determining gestational age and identifying prematurity was assessed by comparing them to ultrasound.

RESULTS:

By ultrasound, infant mean gestational age at birth was 38.3 weeks (SD = 1.6) with 16% born at less than 37 gestation. LMP was more accurate than NB (mean difference of +0.13 weeks for LMP and +0.61 weeks for NB). However, LMP and NB estimates had low agreement with ultrasound-determined gestational age (Lin's concordance<0.48 for both methods) and preterm birth (κ<0.29 for both methods). By LMP, 18% were judged premature compared with 6% by NB. LMP underestimated gestational age among women presenting later to prenatal care (0.18 weeks for each additional week). Gestational age for preterm infants was overestimated by nearly one week using LMP and nearly two weeks using NB. New Ballard neuromuscular measurements were more predictive of preterm birth than those measuring physical criteria.

CONCLUSION:

In an indigenous population in highland Guatemala, LMP overestimated prematurity by 2% and NB underestimated prematurity by 10% compared with ultrasound estimates. New, simple and accurate methods are needed to identify preterm birth in resource-limited settings worldwide.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rural Population / Gestational Age / Premature Birth Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: America central / Guatemala Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rural Population / Gestational Age / Premature Birth Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: America central / Guatemala Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States