Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Call for action: how to improve use of patient-reported outcomes to guide clinical decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.
Fautrel, Bruno; Alten, Rieke; Kirkham, Bruce; de la Torre, Inmaculada; Durand, Frederick; Barry, Jane; Holzkaemper, Thorsten; Fakhouri, Walid; Taylor, Peter C.
Affiliation
  • Fautrel B; Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Universitaire Paris 06, Paris, France.
  • Alten R; Department of Rheumatology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Kirkham B; Schlosspark-Klinik University Medicine, 14059, Berlin, Germany.
  • de la Torre I; Department of Rheumatology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
  • Durand F; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Barry J; Lilly France, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
  • Holzkaemper T; Eli Lilly and Company, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
  • Fakhouri W; Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
  • Taylor PC; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rheumatol Int ; 38(6): 935-947, 2018 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29564549
ABSTRACT
Current guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend early treatment and a treat-to-target goal of remission or low disease activity. Over the past decade, this approach has been extremely successful in reducing disease activity and joint damage in patients with RA. At the same time, however, overall patient perception of well-being appears to have decreased with respect to outcome measures considered important by patients themselves, such as pain, fatigue, physical function and quality of life. The timely and effective use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) could encourage physicians to focus more on the impact of RA on patients and how patients are feeling. This in turn would facilitate shared decision making between patients and physicians, ultimately leading to a more patient-centered approach and improved patient care. Indeed, PROs provide information about individual patients that complements information provided by physical assessment and composite scores, and can also be used to guide patient care, such as determining whether a clinic visit is needed or whether treatment modifications are necessary. This is particularly important for patients who do not achieve the aspirational target of remission or low disease activity with pharmacological treatment. A number of validated PRO questionnaires are available, but how and which PROs should be incorporated into rheumatology clinical practice as part of the decision-making process is still controversial. Combining PROs with technology, such as computer adaptive tests, electronic PRO systems, web-based platforms and patient dashboards, could further aid PRO integration into daily rheumatology clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patients / Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Quality of Life / Clinical Decision-Making / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Rheumatol Int Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patients / Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Quality of Life / Clinical Decision-Making / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Rheumatol Int Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: France