Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Microwear textures of Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus molars in relation to paleoenvironment and diet.
Peterson, Alexandria; Abella, Elicia F; Grine, Frederick E; Teaford, Mark F; Ungar, Peter S.
Affiliation
  • Peterson A; Environmental Dynamics Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
  • Abella EF; Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
  • Grine FE; Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. Electronic address: frederick.grine@stonybrook.edu.
  • Teaford MF; Department of Basic Science, Touro University, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA.
  • Ungar PS; Environmental Dynamics Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
J Hum Evol ; 119: 42-63, 2018 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685753
The importance of diet in primate ecology has motivated the use of a variety of methods to reconstruct dietary habits of extinct hominin taxa. Dental microwear is one such approach that preserves evidence from consumed food items. This study is based on 44 specimens of Australopithecus africanus from Makapansgat and Sterkfontein, and 66 specimens of Paranthropus robustus from Swartkrans, Kromdraai and Drimolen. These samples enable examination of potential differences between the two assemblages of A. africanus, and among the various assemblages of P. robustus in relation to the paleoenvironmental reconstructions that have been proffered for each fossil site. Sixteen microwear texture variables were recorded for each specimen from digital elevation models generated using a white-light confocal profiler. Only two of these differ significantly between the Makapansgat and Sterkfontein samples of A. africanus. None of the microwear texture variables differs significantly among the samples of P. robustus. On the other hand, P. robustus has significantly higher values than A. africanus for 11 variables related to feature complexity, size, and depth; P. robustus exhibits rougher surfaces that comprise larger, deeper features. In contrast, A. africanus has smoother, simpler wear surfaces with smaller, shallower and more anisotropic features. As for possible habitat differences among the various sites, only a relatively small number of subtle differences are evident between the specimens of A. africanus from Makapansgat and Sterkfontein, and there are none among the specimens of P. robustus from various deposits. As such, it is reasonable to conclude that, while subtle differences in microwear textures may reflect differences in background habitats, the wear fabric differences between P. robustus and A. africanus are most reasonably interpreted as having been driven by dietary differences.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hominidae / Diet / Environment / Fossils / Molar Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: En Journal: J Hum Evol Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hominidae / Diet / Environment / Fossils / Molar Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: En Journal: J Hum Evol Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States