VALUE AND PERFORMANCE OF ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS: A COST-MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Determine the relationship between quality of an accountable care organization (ACO) and its long-term reduction in healthcare costs. METHODS: We conducted a cost minimization analysis. Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid cost and quality data, we calculated weighted composite quality scores for each ACO and organization-level cost savings. We used Markov modeling to compute the probability that an ACO transitioned between different quality levels in successive years. Considering a health-systems perspective with costs discounted at 3 percent, we conducted 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to project long-term cost savings by quality level over a 10-year period. We compared the change in per-member expenditures of Pioneer (early-adopters) ACOs versus Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACOs to assess the impact of coordination of care, the main mechanism for cost savings. RESULTS: Overall, Pioneer ACOs saved USD 641.24 per beneficiary and MSSP ACOs saved USD 535.59 per beneficiary. By quality level (a) high quality organizations saved the most money (Pioneer USD 459; MSSP USD 816); (b) medium quality saved some money (Pioneer USD 222; MSSP USD 105); and (c) low quality suffered financial losses (Pioneer USD -40; MSSP USD -386). CONCLUSIONS: Within the existing fee-for-service healthcare model, ACOs are a mechanism for decreasing costs by improving quality of care. Higher quality organizations incorporate greater levels of coordination of care, which is associated with greater cost savings. Pioneer ACOs have the highest level of integration of services; hence, they save the most money.