Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-Reported Quality of Life in Men with Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Undergoing Proton Therapy for Management of Prostate Cancer.
Lee, Derek T; Mendenhall, Nancy P; Smith, Tamara L; Morris, Christopher G; Nichols, Romaine C; Bryant, Curtis; Henderson, Randal H; Mendenhall, William M; Costa, Joseph; Williams, Christopher R; Li, Zuofeng; Hoppe, Bradford S.
Affiliation
  • Lee DT; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Mendenhall NP; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Smith TL; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Morris CG; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Nichols RC; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Bryant C; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Henderson RH; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Mendenhall WM; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Costa J; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Williams CR; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Li Z; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Hoppe BS; University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
Int J Part Ther ; 2(4): 518-524, 2016.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30079368
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We report on quality of life (QOL) and early toxicity among men with prostate cancer who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) before proton therapy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Between 2006 and 2010, 1,289 patients were treated definitively with proton therapy for prostate cancer at our institution and enrolled on a prospective outcomes-tracking protocol. Ninety-six of the men had received a TURP before proton therapy, while 1,193 men had not. Baseline comorbidities, medications, expanded prostate index composite (EPIC) score, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and CTCAE vs.3 toxicity assessment were collected prospectively. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate freedom from toxicity.

RESULTS:

Men who had TURP before proton therapy had lower baseline EPIC scores for urinary incontinence, bowel summary, and sexual summary compared with the non-TURP group, but no significant difference in urinary obstructive score was observed. After controlling for baseline scores, there was no significant difference in bowel summary or sexual summary scores between the two groups over time. There were, however, differences for urinary irritation/obstruction scores and urinary incontinence scores favoring those patients who did not have a TURP-like procedure. Toxicity assessment showed that the 2-year and 5-year rates of grade 3 genitourinary toxicity in the pretreatment TURP group were 12.3% and 17.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pretreatment TURP was associated with both a high incidence of physician-assessed toxicity and inferior patient-reported QOL scores both before and after proton therapy treatment. Studies investigating QOL and toxicity after specific prostate cancer therapies should stratify patients by pretreatment TURP. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm if these differences ever resolve.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: Int J Part Ther Year: 2016 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: Int J Part Ther Year: 2016 Type: Article