Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reconstruction in the Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient: Results from the National Cancer Database.
Weiss, Anna; Chu, Carrie K; Lin, Heather; Shen, Yu; Shaitelman, Simona F; Garvey, Patrick Bryan; Bedrosian, Isabelle; Babiera, Gildy V.
Affiliation
  • Weiss A; Department of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. aweiss5@bwh.harvard.edu.
  • Chu CK; Plastic Surgery, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Lin H; Department of Biostatistics, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Shen Y; Department of Biostatistics, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Shaitelman SF; Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Garvey PB; Plastic Surgery, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Bedrosian I; Breast Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Babiera GV; Breast Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson, Houston, TX, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(11): 3125-3133, 2018 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30109538
PURPOSE: Modern treatments are prolonging life for metastatic breast cancer patients. Reconstruction in these patients is controversial. The purpose of this study was to characterize de novo metastatic breast cancer patients who undergo mastectomy and reconstruction and to report complication and survival rates. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for de novo metastatic breast cancer patients, who underwent systemic therapy and mastectomy with reconstruction (R) or without reconstruction (NR) between 2004 and 2013. Patient-tumor characteristics, mortality, and readmissions were compared. Propensity score matched analysis was performed, and survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 8554 patients fulfilled study criteria (n = 980/11.5% R vs. n = 7574/88.5% NR). There was a significant increase in reconstruction rates by year: 5.2% in 2004, 14.3% in 2013 (p < 0.0001). Compared with the NR patients, R patients were younger (mean age 49 vs. 58 years, p < 0.0001), more hormone receptor-positive (76.1% vs. 70.5%, p = 0.0004), had lower grade disease (p = 0.0082), and fewer sites of metastases (85.7% had 1 metastasis; 14.3% had ≥ 2 R vs. 79% had 1; 21% had ≥ 2 NR, p = 0.0002). R patients received more hormonal and chemotherapy than NR but equally received radiation. Median overall survival of the total cohort was 45 months, and median overall survivals of R and NR groups by matched analysis were 56.7 and 55.3 months respectively (p = 0.86). Thirty-day mortality (0.2%-R, 0.3%-NR, p = 0.56) and readmissions (5.9%-R, 5.8%-NR, p = 0.81) were similar; 90-day mortality also was similar (1.1%-R vs. 1.6%-NR, p = 0.796). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing trend to reconstruct metastatic breast cancer patients with low complication rates, without survival compromise. Impact on quality of life warrants further assessment.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Breast Neoplasms / Databases, Factual / Mammaplasty Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Breast Neoplasms / Databases, Factual / Mammaplasty Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States