Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a prospective multicenter study.
Barthet, Marc; Giovannini, Marc; Lesavre, Nathalie; Boustiere, Christian; Napoleon, Bertrand; Koch, Stéphane; Gasmi, Mohamed; Vanbiervliet, Geoffroy; Gonzalez, Jean-Michel.
Affiliation
  • Barthet M; Aix Marseille Université, Service de Gastro-entérologie, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
  • Giovannini M; Endoscopy Unit, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
  • Lesavre N; Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
  • Boustiere C; Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Saint-Joseph, Marseille, France.
  • Napoleon B; Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France.
  • Koch S; Department of Gastroenterology, CHRU Minjoz, Besançon, France.
  • Gasmi M; Aix Marseille Université, Service de Gastro-entérologie, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
  • Vanbiervliet G; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital L'Archet 2, Nice, France.
  • Gonzalez JM; Aix Marseille Université, Service de Gastro-entérologie, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Endoscopy ; 51(9): 836-842, 2019 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30669161
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) with worrisome features are surgically managed. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has recently been developed. The safety of EUS-RFA was the primary end point of this study, its efficacy the secondary end point.

METHODS:

This was a prospective multicenter study that was planned to include 30 patients with a 1-year follow-up with either a NET < 2 cm or a pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN), either a branch duct IPMN with worrisome features or a mucinous cystadenoma (MCA). EUS-RFA was performed with an 18G RFA cooling needle.

RESULTS:

12 patients had 14 NETs (mean size 13.1 mm, range 10 - 20 mm); 17 patients had cystic tumors (16 IPMNs, 1 MCA; mean size 28 mm, range 9 - 60 mm). Overall three adverse events occurred (10 %), two of these in the first two patients (one pancreatitis, one small-bowel perforation). After these initial patients, modifications in the protocol resulted in a decrease in complications (3.5 %), with one patient having a pancreatic ductal stenosis. Among the 14 NETs, at 1-year follow-up 12 had completely disappeared (86 % tumor resolution), with three patients having a delayed response. Among the 17 PCNs, at 12 months, there were 11 complete disappearances and one diameter that decreased by > 50 % (significant response rate 71 %). All 12 mural nodules showed complete resolution.

CONCLUSIONS:

EUS-RFA of pancreatic NETs or PCNs is safe with a 10 % complication rate, which can be decreased by improved prophylaxis for the procedure.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Cyst / Pancreatic Neoplasms / Catheter Ablation / Ultrasonography, Interventional / Neuroendocrine Tumors / Endosonography Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Endoscopy Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Cyst / Pancreatic Neoplasms / Catheter Ablation / Ultrasonography, Interventional / Neuroendocrine Tumors / Endosonography Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Endoscopy Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: France