Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient specific prospective respiratory motion correction for efficient, free-breathing cardiovascular MRI.
Bush, Michael A; Ahmad, Rizwan; Jin, Ning; Liu, Yingmin; Simonetti, Orlando P.
Affiliation
  • Bush MA; Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Ahmad R; Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Jin N; Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Liu Y; Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Simonetti OP; Cardiovascular MR R&D, Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Columbus, Ohio.
Magn Reson Med ; 81(6): 3662-3674, 2019 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30761599
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To develop a patient-specific respiratory motion correction technique with true 100% acquisition efficiency.

METHODS:

A short training scan consisting of a series of single heartbeat images, each acquired with a preceding diaphragmatic navigator, was performed to fit a model relating the patient-specific 3D respiratory motion of the heart-to-diaphragm position. The resulting motion model was then used to update the imaging plane in real-time to correct for translational motion based on respiratory position provided by the navigator. The method was tested in a group of 11 volunteers with 5 separate free-breathing acquisitions FB, no motion correction; FB-TF, free breathing with a linear tracking factor; Nav Gate, navigator gating; Nav Gate-TF, navigator gating with a tracking factor; and PROCO, prospective motion correction (proposed). Each acquisition lasted for 50 accepted heartbeats, where non-gated scans had a 100% acceptance rate, and gated scans accepted data only within a ±4 mm navigator window. Retrospective image registration was used to measure residual motion and determine the effectiveness of each method.

RESULTS:

PROCO reduced the range/RMSE of residual motion to 4.08 ± 1.4/0.90 ± 0.3 mm, compared to 10.78 ± 6.9/2.97 ± 2.2 mm for FB, 5.32 ± 2.92/1.24 ± 0.8 mm for FB-TF, 4.08 ± 1.6/0.93 ± 0.4 mm for Nav Gate, and 2.90 ± 1.0/0.63 ± 0.2 mm for Nav Gate-TF. Nav Gate and Nav Gate-TF reduced scan efficiency to 48.84 ± 9.31% and 54.54 ± 10.12%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

PROCO successfully limited the residual motion in single-shot imaging to the level of traditional navigator gating while maintaining 100% acquisition efficiency.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques / Patient-Specific Modeling / Heart Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Magn Reson Med Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2019 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques / Patient-Specific Modeling / Heart Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Magn Reson Med Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2019 Type: Article