Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adoption of New Medical Technologies: The Case of Customized Individually Made Knee Implants.
Namin, Amir T; Jalali, Mohammad S; Vahdat, Vahab; Bedair, Hany S; O'Connor, Mary I; Kamarthi, Sagar; Isaacs, Jacqueline A.
Affiliation
  • Namin AT; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Jalali MS; MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: msjalali@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Vahdat V; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA; MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Bedair HS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • O'Connor MI; Center for Musculoskeletal Care, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Kamarthi S; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Isaacs JA; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Value Health ; 22(4): 423-430, 2019 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30975393
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the impact of insurance coverage on the adoption of customized individually made (CIM) knee implants and to compare patient outcomes and cost effectiveness of off-the-shelf and CIM implants.

METHODS:

A system dynamics simulation model was developed to study adoption dynamics of CIM and meet the research objectives. The model reproduced the historical data on primary and revision knee replacement implants obtained from the literature and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Then the dynamics of adoption of CIM implants were simulated from 2018 to 2026. The rate of 90-day readmission, 3-year revision surgery, recovery period, time savings in operating rooms, and the associated cost within 3 years of primary knee replacement implants were used as performance metrics.

RESULTS:

The simulation results indicate that by 2026, an adoption rate of 90% for CIM implants can reduce the number of readmissions and revision surgeries by 62% and 39%, respectively, and can save hospitals and surgeons 6% on procedure time and cut down cumulative healthcare costs by approximately $38 billion.

CONCLUSIONS:

CIM implants have the potential to deliver high-quality care while decreasing overall healthcare costs, but their adoption requires the expansion of current insurance coverage. This work presents the first systematic study to understand the dynamics of adoption of CIM knee implants and instrumentation. More broadly, the current modeling approach and systems thinking perspective could be used to consider the adoption of any emerging customized therapies for personalized medicine.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Prosthesis Design / Health Care Costs / Insurance Coverage / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Insurance, Health / Knee Prosthesis Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Value Health Journal subject: FARMACOLOGIA Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Prosthesis Design / Health Care Costs / Insurance Coverage / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Insurance, Health / Knee Prosthesis Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Value Health Journal subject: FARMACOLOGIA Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States