Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Trends of Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clostridium difficileIsolates in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2015 to 2017].
Fang, Qing-Qing; Zhang, Xiao-Xia; Wang, Xiao-Hui; Feng, Ping; Zong, Zhi-Yong.
Affiliation
  • Fang QQ; Center of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Zhang XX; Center of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Wang XH; Center of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Feng P; Center of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Zong ZY; Center of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 50(1): 123-127, 2019 Jan.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31037915
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the drug sensitivity and its trends of Clostridium difficile diarrhea pathogenic strains in a large tertiary hospital, so as to provide basic reference data for the treatment and control of Clostridium difficile infection. METHODS: There were 73 toxigenic isolates collected from fecal sample of diarrheal patients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University during two periods. One was from August to December in 2015 (44 strains) , and another was from July 2016 to July 2017 (29 strains) . Enhanced nosocomial infection control measures were implemented during the second sample collection period. The toxin gene was amplified by PCR and sequenced for identification. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of metronidazole, vancomycin, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, rifaximin, fidaxomicin and linezolid were determined using agar double dilution method. We analyzed the drug resistance characteristics of Clostridium difficile and compared the changes of antimicrobial resistance before and after the enhanced control measures implementation. RESULTS: All 73 strains tested were sensitive to metronidazole and vancomycin. Resistance rate to clindamycin, moxifloxacin, tetracycline and rifaximin were 79.5%, 26.0%, 27.4%, and 9.5%, respectively. Fidaxomicin and nitazoxanide were highly susceptible in vitro against these strains with MIC ranges<0.008-0.5 mg/L ( P<0.05). Resistance to clindamycin and moxifloxacin were significantly decreased after enhanced control measures implementation (resistance rates were 99.5% vs. 44.8%, 36.4% vs. 10.3%, P<0.05). Additionally, isolate with decreased susceptibility to tinezolid as MIC 16 mg/L was found. CONCLUSION: Clostridium difficileis highly resistant to clindamycin and quinolones. Since strains remain highly sensitive to metronidazole and vancomycin in our hospital, empirical application is reasonable without routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clostridioides difficile / Clostridium Infections Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: Zh Journal: Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: China
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clostridioides difficile / Clostridium Infections Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: Zh Journal: Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: China