Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion.
Roberts, Brian W; Roberts, Michael B; Yao, Jady; Bosire, Joshua; Mazzarelli, Anthony; Trzeciak, Stephen.
Affiliation
  • Roberts BW; Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Roberts MB; Center for Humanism, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Yao J; Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessment, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Bosire J; Department of Patient Family Centered Care, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Mazzarelli A; Department of Patient Family Centered Care, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Trzeciak S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(5): e193976, 2019 05 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31099870
Importance: Clinician compassion is a vital element of health care quality. Currently, there appears to be no validated and feasible method for health care organizations to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion on a large scale. Objective: To develop and validate a tool for measuring patient assessment of clinician compassion that can be used in conjunction with the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) survey. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study took place from June 1 to August 30, 2018, at a US academic health care system among a pilot cohort consisting of 3325 adult patients and a validation cohort consisting of 3483 adult patients, both of whom had an outpatient clinic visit and completed the CG-CAHPS survey. Main Outcomes and Measurements: After a comprehensive literature review, 12 candidate survey items were developed. Face and construct validity were performed. Candidate items were disseminated to patients in conjunction with the CG-CAHPS survey in a series of 2 studies: (1) exploratory factor analysis in one cohort to determine the factor structure and the most parsimonious set of items; and (2) validity testing in a second cohort using confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was tested using Cronbach α. Convergent validity was tested with patient assessment of clinician communication and overall satisfaction questions from CG-CAHPS survey. Results: Overall, 6493 patient responses were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 60 (15) years, 4239 patients (65.3%) were women, and 5079 (78.2%) were white. Exploratory factor analyses identified a 5-item compassion measure to be the most parsimonious. Confirmatory factor analyses found good fit. The compassion measure demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.94) and convergent validity (clinician communication: ρ = 0.44; overall satisfaction: ρ = 0.52) but reflected a patient experience domain (compassionate care) distinct from what is currently captured in the CG-CAHPS survey. Conclusions and Relevance: A simple 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion was developed and validated for use in conjunction with CG-CAHPS survey.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surveys and Questionnaires / Patient Satisfaction / Empathy Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: JAMA Netw Open Year: 2019 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surveys and Questionnaires / Patient Satisfaction / Empathy Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: JAMA Netw Open Year: 2019 Type: Article