Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Satisfaction with a digitally-enabled telephone health coaching intervention for people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia.
Coventry, Peter; Bower, Peter; Blakemore, Amy; Baker, Elizabeth; Hann, Mark; Li, Jinshuo; Paisley, Angela; Gibson, Martin.
Affiliation
  • Coventry P; 1Department of Health Sciences and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
  • Bower P; 2NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Blakemore A; 3Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Baker E; 3Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Hann M; 2NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Li J; 4Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
  • Paisley A; 5Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
  • Gibson M; 5Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
NPJ Digit Med ; 2: 5, 2019.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31304355
ABSTRACT
International evidence shows that lifestyle interventions can effectively reduce the risk of developing diabetes in people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). A candidate intervention that has potential to be rolled out at population level is health coaching. Digital interventions offer the means to potentially enhance user satisfaction with health coaching and improve efficiencies. We used a randomised controlled trial to test whether a digitally-enabled health coaching intervention that included an online dashboard and telephone health coaching improved user satisfaction and cost-efficiencies compared with a telephone only health coaching intervention. The primary outcome was satisfaction measured by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). 103 participants with NDH were allocated to the telephone coaching only intervention and 106 participants with NDH were allocated to the digital and telephone coaching intervention. In an intention-to-treat analysis satisfaction was higher in participants allocated to the digital and telephone coaching intervention than those allocated to the telephone only intervention, but the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences between the groups on secondary outcomes (HbA1c, BMI, activation, depression, self-management, health status). From a service commissioning perspective the mean incremental cost of the digitally-enabled intervention was £236 ($332; €270). Call times, including administration, were longer for participants allocated to the digitally-enabled intervention. The results show that user satisfaction with digitally-enabled intervention is broadly equivalent with that of telephone delivered interventions in the context of routinely delivered diabetes prevention programmes. There is scope for future work that assesses how economies of scale can be achieved at larger user bases.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: NPJ Digit Med Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: NPJ Digit Med Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom