Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the clinical impact of the endometrial receptivity array in PGT-A and oocyte donation cycles?
Neves, Ana Raquel; Devesa, Marta; Martínez, Francisca; Garcia-Martinez, Sandra; Rodriguez, Ignacio; Polyzos, Nikolaos P; Coroleu, Buenaventura.
Affiliation
  • Neves AR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Rua Augusta 17, 3000-045, Coimbra, Portugal. anaraquel.lneves@gmail.com.
  • Devesa M; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Martínez F; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Garcia-Martinez S; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Rodriguez I; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Polyzos NP; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Coroleu B; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Surgical and Clinical Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(9): 1901-1908, 2019 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352621
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the influence of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test on the implantation rate (IR) and pregnancy rate (PR) in patients with previous failed euploid embryo transfers (Euploid-ET) or oocyte donation embryo transfers (Donor-ET).

METHODS:

Single-center retrospective study of patients with ≥ 1 previous failed Euploi-ET (n = 24) or ≥ 2 failed Donor-ET (n = 32) who underwent an ERA test and a post-ERA Euploid-ET/Donor-ET between 2012 and 2018. Controls were patients with ≥ 1 previously failed Euploid-ET (n = 119) or ≥ 2 failed Donor-ET (n = 158) who underwent Euploid-ET/Donor-ET during the same period without performing an ERA test. Only blastocyst stage embryos were included. IR/PR was compared between the post-ERA ET and the last ET in the control group.

RESULTS:

There was no statistically significant difference regarding IR [55.6% (34.6-76.5%) vs. 65.0% (56.9-73.1%)] nor PR (58.3% vs.70.6%, p = 0.238) in the Euploid-ET ERA vs. Euploid-ET control groups. In the Donor-ET arm, both IR [26.8% (12.3-41.4%) vs. 57.2% (50.1-64.3%)] and PR (34.4% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the ERA group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that performing an ERA test did not influence the PR in the Euploid-ET arm and was associated with a diminished PR in the Donor-ET arm. In the ERA group, 41.1% patients were non-receptive (NR). No significant difference was found regarding IR/PR in NR vs. receptive patients in both Euploid-ET/Donor-ET arms.

CONCLUSIONS:

In our sample, the performance of an ERA test did not improve pregnancy outcomes. Future prospective studies in larger samples are needed to confirm the role of the ERA test in Euploid-ET/Donor-ET.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Oocyte Donation / Preimplantation Diagnosis / Endometrium Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Journal subject: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Portugal

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Oocyte Donation / Preimplantation Diagnosis / Endometrium Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Journal subject: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Portugal