Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lewis, C; Roberts, N P; Simon, N; Bethell, A; Bisson, J I.
Affiliation
  • Lewis C; Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
  • Roberts NP; Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
  • Simon N; Directorate of Psychology and Psychological Therapies, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
  • Bethell A; Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
  • Bisson JI; Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 140(6): 508-521, 2019 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31359407
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (i-CBT) is an effective treatment for those who meet diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

METHOD:

A systematic review was undertaken according to Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines. The primary outcome measures were reduction in PTSD symptoms and drop-out. Categorical outcomes were meta-analysed as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs).

RESULTS:

Ten studies with 720 participants were included. Evidence showed that i-CBT may be associated with a clinically important reduction in post-treatment PTSD symptoms compared with wait list (SMD -0.60, 95% confidence interval -0.97 to -0.24; N = 560); however, only three studies reported follow-up data, and there was no evidence to support the maintenance of symptom improvement at follow-up of 3-6 months. There was no evidence of a difference in PTSD symptoms between i-CBT and Internet-delivered non-CBT post-treatment. There was evidence of greater treatment effect from trauma-focused i-CBT than i-CBT without a trauma focus, as well as evidence that treatment effect was increased by the provision of guidance.

CONCLUSIONS:

While the review found some beneficial effects of i-CBT for PTSD post-treatment, the quality of the evidence was very low because of the small number of included trials and there was insufficient evidence to support the maintenance of improvement at follow-up of 3-6 months. Further work is required to establish non-inferiority to current first-line interventions; to determine long-term efficacy; to explore mechanisms of effect; and to establish optimal levels of guidance.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Internet-Based Intervention Type of study: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Internet-Based Intervention Type of study: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom