Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Methadone Rotation to Consensus Opinion.
Smith, Michael A; Quirk, Kyle C; Saul, D'Anna C; Rodgers, Phillip E; Silveira, Maria J.
Affiliation
  • Smith MA; Department of Pharmacy Services, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Electronic address: mandsmit@med.umich.edu.
  • Quirk KC; Department of Pharmacy Services, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Saul DC; Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Rodgers PE; Department of Family Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Silveira MJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 59(1): 116-120, 2020 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31560968
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Methadone is a complex but useful medication for pain management in palliative care. Recent expert opinions have been published on the safe and effective use of methadone.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the success of methadone rotations and evaluate concordance with consensus recommendations by a palliative care consult service.

METHODS:

A retrospective study of methadone rotation practice by a palliative care consult service and outcomes for patients hospitalized between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 at a single academic medical center. A successful rotation was defined as a 30% reduction in pain or as-needed medication use sustained for at least three consecutive days. Patient outcomes were compared with expert consensus recommendations.

RESULTS:

About 59 patients met the inclusion criteria. The study population was mostly Caucasian men and women of equal proportions who were started on methadone for inadequate pain control. Sixty-eight percent of patients were successfully rotated. Subjects who were rotated using a standardized protocol were six times more likely to have a successful rotation (odds ratio 6.28 [1.25-30.92]; P = 0.0238).

CONCLUSION:

The utilization of a standardized protocol was associated with better patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain / Pain Management / Analgesics, Opioid / Methadone Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain / Pain Management / Analgesics, Opioid / Methadone Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2020 Type: Article