Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MRI safety and devices: An update and expert consensus.
Jabehdar Maralani, Pejman; Schieda, Nicola; Hecht, Elizabeth M; Litt, Harold; Hindman, Nicole; Heyn, Chinthaka; Davenport, Matthew S; Zaharchuk, Greg; Hess, Christopher P; Weinreb, Jeffrey.
Affiliation
  • Jabehdar Maralani P; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Schieda N; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Hecht EM; Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Litt H; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Hindman N; Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Heyn C; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Davenport MS; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Zaharchuk G; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Hess CP; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Weinreb J; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 51(3): 657-674, 2020 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31566852
ABSTRACT
The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasing globally, and MRI safety issues regarding medical devices, which are constantly being developed or upgraded, represent an ongoing challenge for MRI personnel. To assist the MRI community, a panel of 10 radiologists with expertise in MRI safety from nine high-volume academic centers formed, with the objective of providing clarity on some of the MRI safety issues for the 10 most frequently questioned devices. Ten device categories were identified. The panel reviewed the literature, including key MRI safety issues regarding screening and adverse event reports, in addition to the manufacturer's Instructions For Use. Using a Delphi-inspired method, 36 practical recommendations were generated with 100% consensus that can aid the clinical MRI community. Level of Evidence 5 Technical Efficacy Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51657-674.
Subject(s)
Key words
Fulltext
Print
XML
PubMed Links
Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada
Fulltext
Print
XML
PubMed Links
Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada