Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of 4 Commercial Immunoassays Used in Measuring the Concentration of Tacrolimus in Blood and Their Cross-Reactivity to Its Metabolites.
Shigematsu, Tomohiro; Suetsugu, Kimitaka; Yamamoto, Nanae; Tsuchiya, Yuichi; Masuda, Satohiro.
Affiliation
  • Shigematsu T; Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Suetsugu K; Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Yamamoto N; Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Tsuchiya Y; Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Masuda S; Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ther Drug Monit ; 42(3): 400-406, 2020 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31568181
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is necessary for appropriate dose adjustment for a successful immunosuppressive therapy. Several commercial immunoassays are available for tacrolimus measurements. This study aimed at simultaneously evaluating the analytical performances of 4 such immunoassays, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as a standard. For the first time, cross-reactivity to tacrolimus metabolites was assessed at concentrations frequently observed in clinical settings, as opposed to the higher concentrations tested by assay manufacturers.

METHODS:

An affinity column-mediated immunoassay (ACMIA), using upgraded flex reagents; released in 2015, a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), and a latex agglutination turbidimetric immunoassay (LTIA) were evaluated using frozen whole blood samples collected from transplantation patients. Cross-reactivities to 3 major tacrolimus metabolites (13-O-demethyl-tacrolimus [M-I], 31-O-demethyl-tacrolimus [M-II], and 15-O-demethyl-tacrolimus [M-III]) were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Each immunoassay correlated well with LC-MS/MS, and the Pearson's correlation coefficients (R) were 0.974, 0.977, 0.978, and 0.902 for ACMIA, CLIA, ECLIA, and LTIA, respectively. Using Bland-Altman difference plots to compare the immunoassays with LC-MS/MS, the calculated average biases were -6.73%, 6.07%, 7.46%, and 12.27% for ACMIA, CLIA, ECLIA, and LTIA, respectively. The cross-reactivities of ACMIA to the tacrolimus metabolites M-II and M-III were 81% and 78%, respectively, when blood was spiked at 2 ng/mL, and 94% and 68%, respectively, when it was spiked at 5 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS:

Each immunoassay was useful, but had its own characteristics. ACMIA cross-reactivities to M-II and M-III were much higher than the respective 18% and 15% reported on its package insert, suggesting that cross-reactivity should be examined at clinically relevant concentrations.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoassay / Tacrolimus / Drug Monitoring / Immunosuppressive Agents Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ther Drug Monit Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoassay / Tacrolimus / Drug Monitoring / Immunosuppressive Agents Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ther Drug Monit Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan