Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Problems with the dual-systems approach to temporal cognition.
Melnikoff, David E; Bargh, John A.
Affiliation
  • Melnikoff DE; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT06511. david.melnikoff@yale.edu  john.bargh@yale.comhttps://acmelab.yale.edu/.
  • Bargh JA; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT06511. david.melnikoff@yale.edu  john.bargh@yale.comhttps://acmelab.yale.edu/.
Behav Brain Sci ; 42: e264, 2019 12 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31826769
ABSTRACT
Contrary to Hoerl & McCormack (H&M), we argue that the best account of temporal cognition in humans is one in which a single system becomes capable of representing time. We suggest that H&M's own evidence for dual systems of temporal cognition - simultaneous contradictory beliefs - does not recommend dual systems, and that the single system approach is more plausible.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Systems Analysis / Cognition Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Behav Brain Sci Year: 2019 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Systems Analysis / Cognition Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Behav Brain Sci Year: 2019 Type: Article