Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of CT artifacts and image recognition of various fiducial markers including two types of thinner fiducial markers for CyberKnife treatment.
Suzuki, Toshihiro; Saito, Masahide; Onishi, Hiroshi; Mochizuki, Koji; Satani, Kenichiro; Yamazaki, Akihiro; Miura, Kenichi; Taka, Shinji; Sano, Naoki; Komiyama, Takafumi; Takahashi, Hiroshi.
Affiliation
  • Suzuki T; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Saito M; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Onishi H; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Mochizuki K; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Satani K; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Yamazaki A; Shizuoka City Shimizu Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Miura K; Shizuoka City Shimizu Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Taka S; Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Sano N; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Komiyama T; Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
  • Takahashi H; Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 25(1): 117-124, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31908605
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of the study was to evaluate computed tomography (CT) artifacts and image recognition of the CyberKnife system. Regarding fiducial markers, VISICOIL of 0.5 mm × 5.0 mm and 0.75 mm × 5.0 mm, ball-shaped Gold Anchor (GA) of 0.28 mm × 10 mm and 0.28 mm × 20 mm, were compared with the standard cylinder marker of 0.9 mm × 3.0 mm (ACCULOC).

BACKGROUND:

Recently, various kinds of commercial fiducial markers have been available in CyberKnife treatment. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The CT images of a water equivalent gel with each fiducial marker were acquired for the evaluation of CT artifacts. The evaluation was performed using the standard deviation of Hounsfield Unit (HU) value for a rectangle region near the fiducial marker. Then, to evaluate the image recognition, each fiducial marker was located to overlap in the target locating system (TLS) for the two sites; the vertebral bone and the pubic bone.

RESULTS:

For CT artifacts, the standard deviations of the VISICOIL of 0.5 mm × 5.0 mm was the smallest. The image recognition of four fiducial markers had a value close to the standard cylinder marker and was feasible for common use, but was slightly poorer when using GA of 0.28 mm × 10 mm in the dynamic conditions.

CONCLUSION:

Our results indicated that VISICOIL 0.5 × 5.0 mm and the GAs can be used nearly always for CyberKnife treatment in spite of their much thinner needles than those of cylinder types.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan