Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic Evaluation of a Sun Protection Promotion Program in California Elementary Schools.
Meenan, Richard T; Reynolds, Kim D; Buller, David B; Massie, Kim; Berteletti, Julia; Buller, Mary K; Ashley, Jeff; Liu, Xia.
Affiliation
  • Meenan RT; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Reynolds KD; School of Community & Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.
  • Buller DB; Klein Buendel, Inc, Lakewood, CO, USA.
  • Massie K; School of Community & Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.
  • Berteletti J; Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
  • Buller MK; Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
  • Ashley J; Sun Safety for Kids, Burbank, CA, USA.
  • Liu X; Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
Am J Health Promot ; 34(8): 848-856, 2020 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32054287
BACKGROUND: An economic evaluation of Sun Safe Schools intervention designed to aid California elementary schools with implementing sun safety practices consistent with local board-approved policy. DESIGN: Program cost analysis: intervention delivery and practice implementation. SETTING: California elementary schools (58 interventions and 60 controls). Principals at 52 intervention and 53 control schools provided complete implementation data. PARTICIPANTS: Principals completing pre-/postintervention surveys assessing practice implementation. INTERVENTION: Phone-based 45-minute session with a project coach on practice implementation, follow-up e-mails/phone contacts, $500 mini-grant. Schools chose from a list of 10 practices for implementation: ultraviolet monitoring, clothing, hats, and/or sunscreen recommendations, outdoor shade, class education, staff training and/or modeling, parent outreach, and resource allocation. The duration of intervention was 20 months. Rolling recruitment/intervention: February 2014 to December 2017. MEASURES: Intervention delivery and practice implementation costs. Correlations of school demographics and administrator beliefs with costs. ANALYSIS: Intervention delivery activities micro-costed. Implemented practices assessed using costing template. RESULTS: Intervention schools: 234 implemented practices, control schools: 157. Twenty-month delivery costs: $29 310; $16 653 (per school: $320) for project staff, mostly mini-grants and coaching time. Administrator costs: $12 657 (per school: $243). Per-student delivery costs: $1.01. Costs of implemented practices: $641 843 for intervention schools (per-school mean: $12 343, median: $6 969); $496 365 for controls (per-school mean: $9365, median: $3123). Delivery costs correlated with implemented practices (0.37, P < .01) and total practice costs (0.37, P < .05). Implemented practices correlated with principal beliefs about the importance of skin cancer prevention to student health (0.46, P < .001) and parents (0.45, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Coaching of elementary school personnel can stimulate sun safety practice implementation at a reasonable cost. Findings can assist schools in implementing appropriate sun safety practices.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Neoplasms Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Health Promot Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Neoplasms Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Health Promot Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States