Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research Pearls: Checklists and Flowcharts to Improve Research Quality.
Brand, Jefferson; Hardy, Richard; Monroe, Emily.
Affiliation
  • Brand J; Department of Sports Medicine, Heartland Orthopedic Specialists, Alexandria, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  • Hardy R; Department of Sports Medicine, Heartland Orthopedic Specialists, Alexandria, Minnesota, U.S.A. Electronic address: rhardy@heartlandorthopedics.com.
  • Monroe E; Department of Sports Medicine, Heartland Orthopedic Specialists, Alexandria, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy ; 36(7): 2030-2038, 2020 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32169662
ABSTRACT
To instill quality in published clinical research, reporting guidelines, consisting of checklists and flowcharts, were developed to protect against reporting poorly designed research, and researchers should be aware of the available instruments and their appropriate use. With the popularity of synthetic reviews, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, there is a greater need to assess risk of bias and study quality. This review highlights the most frequently used guidelines and checklists, risk-of-bias scales, and quality rating scales that can assist researchers with improving their research and its eventual publication.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Research Design / Checklist Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Arthroscopy Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Research Design / Checklist Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Arthroscopy Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States