Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Initiation of Transdermal Fentanyl Among US Commercially Insured Patients Between 2007 and 2015.
Costantino, Ryan C; Gressler, Laura E; Onukwugha, Eberechukwu; McPherson, Mary Lynn; Fudin, Jeffrey; Villalonga-Olives, Ester; Slejko, Julia F.
Affiliation
  • Costantino RC; Defense Health Agency, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Gressler LE; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Onukwugha E; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Service Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • McPherson ML; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Service Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Fudin J; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Service Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Villalonga-Olives E; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Slejko JF; Remitigate, Delmar, New York.
Pain Med ; 21(10): 2229-2236, 2020 10 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32377671
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study examined patterns of initial transdermal fentanyl (TDF) claims among US commercially insured patients and explored the risk of 30-day hospitalization among patients with and without prior opioid exposure necessary to produce tolerance.

DESIGN:

A retrospective cohort study of initial outpatient TDF prescriptions.

SETTING:

A 10% random sample of commercially insured enrollees within the IQVIA Health Plan Claims Database (formerly known as PharMetrics Plus).

SUBJECTS:

Individuals with a claim for TDF between 2007 and 2015.

METHODS:

The primary exposure was a new transdermal fentanyl claim, and the primary outcome was guideline concordance based on time and dose exposure.

RESULTS:

Among the 24,770 patients in the cohort, 4,848 (20%) patients had sufficient time exposure to opioids before TDF. Among those with sufficient time exposure, 3,971 (82%) had adequate opioid exposure based on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) package insert dosing guidance. Overall, 3,971 of the 24,770 (16%) patients received guideline-consistent TDF. An exploratory analysis of 30-day hospitalization after a TDF claim did not detect a difference in odds between guideline-consistent or -inconsistent groups when adjusted for variables known to influence the risk of opioid-induced respiratory depression.

CONCLUSIONS:

A majority of patients met FDA opioid dose thresholds for TDF but had insufficient time exposure based on package insert recommendations for tolerance. Exploratory analysis did not detect a difference in odds for all-cause hospitalization or respiratory-related 30-day hospitalization between guideline-consistent or -inconsistent TDF claims. Prescribers should continue to adhere to FDA TDF labeling, although certain aspects of the labeling should be reevaluated or clarified.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fentanyl / Analgesics, Opioid Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Pain Med Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fentanyl / Analgesics, Opioid Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Pain Med Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article