Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tolerability and effectiveness of povidone-iodine or mupirocin versus saline sinus irrigations for chronic rhinosinusitis.
Lee, Victoria S; Pottinger, Paul S; Davis, Greg E.
Affiliation
  • Lee VS; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Box 356515, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America. Electronic address: vlee39@uic.edu.
  • Pottinger PS; Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, PO Box 356130, Courier BB-302, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America.
  • Davis GE; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Box 356515, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(5): 102604, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32563787
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The role of topical anti-infectives in acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis is controversial. Povidone-iodine is an anti-bacterial and anti-viral that is affordable and available over-the-counter and may demonstrate advantages over mupirocin as a sinus irrigation therapy. The objective was to compare povidone-iodine or mupirocin versus saline sinus irrigations for sinusitis exacerbations in post-surgery subjects as well as to assess tolerability of povidone-iodine sinus irrigations. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This was a prospective single-blinded (clinician only) randomized controlled trial. Subjects were post-surgery with acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis and gram-positive bacteria on culture. They received povidone-iodine, mupirocin, or saline sinus irrigations, twice daily for 30 days. Outcomes were post-treatment culture negativity (primary) and Sinonasal Outcome Test-20 and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score change (secondary).

RESULTS:

Of the 62 subjects analyzed, post-treatment culture negativity rate was higher in the MUP (14/20, 70%) group compared to the PI (9/21, 43%) and SAL (9/19, 47%) groups, although this was not significant (p = 0.29). Povidone-iodine sinus irrigations at the 1% concentration were very well-tolerated, similar to saline irrigations. There were no significant differences in Sinonasal Outcome Test-20 score (povidone-iodine -0.3 [-0.6, 0.05] vs. mupirocin -0.3 [-0.7, 0.05] vs. saline -0.4 [-0.8, 0.05]; p = 0.86) or Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score (povidone-iodine -3.5 [-7, -0.5] vs. mupirocin -2 [-4, 2] vs. saline -3 [-5, 0]; p = 0.45) change. No serious adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients who have had prior sinus surgery with acute exacerbations of CRS and gram-positive bacteria on culture, mupirocin sinus irrigations achieved a better post-treatment culture "control" rate compared to saline and povidone-iodine. In addition, 1% povidone-iodine solution was well-tolerated as a sinus irrigation and may represent a feasible method for temporarily disinfecting the sinonasal cavity of bacteria and viruses such as COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Povidone-Iodine / Sinusitis / Rhinitis / Mupirocin / Anti-Bacterial Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Otolaryngol Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Povidone-Iodine / Sinusitis / Rhinitis / Mupirocin / Anti-Bacterial Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Otolaryngol Year: 2020 Type: Article