Systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness of treatment options against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
J Med Virol
; 93(2): 775-785, 2021 02.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32667699
Treatment options for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are limited with no clarity on efficacy and safety profiles. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on patients ≥18 years reporting data on therapeutic interventions in SARS-CoV-2. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were rates of mechanical ventilation, viral clearance, adverse events, discharge, and progression to severe disease. Pooled rates and odds ratios (OR) were calculated. Twenty-nine studies with 5207 patients were included. Pooled all-cause mortality in intervention arm was 12.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1%-17.4%). Mortality was significantly higher for studies using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for intervention (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.97-1.89). Adverse events were also higher in HCQ subgroup (OR: 3.88; 95% CI: 1.60-9.45). There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. There is a need for well-designed randomized clinical trials for further investigation of every therapeutic intervention for further insight into different therapeutic options.
Key words
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Antiviral Agents
/
Adenosine Monophosphate
/
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
/
Ritonavir
/
Alanine
/
Lopinavir
/
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/
COVID-19
/
Hydroxychloroquine
Type of study:
Clinical_trials
/
Etiology_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Limits:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Language:
En
Journal:
J Med Virol
Year:
2021
Type:
Article