Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and Pilot Evaluation of an Educational Tool for the FLACC Pain Scale.
Choueiry, Juliana; Reszel, Jessica; Hamid, Jemila S; Wilding, Jodi; Martelli, Brenda; Harrison, Denise.
Affiliation
  • Choueiry J; School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: jchoueiry@cheo.on.ca.
  • Reszel J; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hamid JS; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wilding J; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Martelli B; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Harrison D; School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 21(6): 523-529, 2020 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682637
BACKGROUND: The FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) pain scale is commonly used for pediatric pain assessment; however, no online educational tool exists to facilitate the use of the scale. AIMS: This study aimed to develop an online educational tool and evaluate its effect on nurse knowledge, user confidence, and scoring accuracy. DESIGN AND METHODS: In phase 1, semistructured interviews were conducted to identify preferred educational features and content. Eight informants were interviewed in phase 1. Recommendations informed the development of the educational tool. Data were analyzed via conventional content analysis. Phase 2 involved a pre-post evaluation of the tool through online surveys. Posteducational data were collected immediately after the tool was completed. Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar-Bowker tests were used to compare pre- and post-training knowledge, confidence, and FLACC scores. Scoring accuracy was examined using percentage agreement and consensus analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four nurses participated in phase 2. The educational tool significantly improved knowledge (p < .0001) and increased user confidence, although not to a significant level (p = .06). There was a significant improvement in correct assessment of moderate pain (p = .04). Almost all nurses correctly assessed severe pain before and after education (91%). However, there was a decrease in accurate assessment of mild pain (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Because the intervention improved knowledge, user confidence, and assessment accuracy of moderate pain, it would be useful to implement such a tool as part of clinician education. However, further modifications will be needed to improve assessment of mild pain.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pediatrics / Teaching / Pain Measurement Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Pain Manag Nurs Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pediatrics / Teaching / Pain Measurement Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Pain Manag Nurs Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article