Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using Prior Culture Results to Improve Initial Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing: An Evaluation of a Simple Clinical Heuristic.
Elligsen, Marion; Pinto, Ruxandra; Leis, Jerome A; Walker, Sandra A N; MacFadden, Derek R; Daneman, Nick.
Affiliation
  • Elligsen M; Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
  • Pinto R; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Leis JA; Department of Critical Care and Population Health, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
  • Walker SAN; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • MacFadden DR; Centre of Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
  • Daneman N; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(10): e630-e638, 2021 05 18.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32930719
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A patient's prior cultures can inform the subsequent risk of infection from resistant organisms, yet prescribers often fail to incorporate these results into their empiric antibiotic selection. Given that timely initiation of adequate antibiotics has been associated with improved outcomes, there is an urgent need to address this gap.

METHODS:

In order to better incorporate prior culture results in the selection of empiric antibiotics, we performed a pragmatic, prospective, hospital-wide intervention (1) empiric antibiotic prescriptions were assessed for clinically significant discordance with the most recent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surveillance swab, previous cultures for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), and the most recent culture for a Gram-negative (GN) organism; and (2) if discordant, an antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist provided recommendations for alternative therapy. The impact was analyzed using a quasi-experimental design comparing two 9-month periods (pre- and postintervention) at a large academic, tertiary care institution.

RESULTS:

Clinically significant discordance was identified 99 times in the preintervention period and 86 times in the intervention period. The proportion of patients that received concordant therapy increased from 73% (72/99) in the control group to 88% (76/86) in the intervention group (P = .01). The median time to concordant therapy was shorter in the intervention group than the control group (25 vs 55 hrs, respectively; P < .001; adjusted hazard ratio = 1.95 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.37-2.77; P < .001]). The median duration of unnecessary vancomycin therapy was reduced by 1.1 days (95% CI, .5-1.6 days; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

This intervention improved prescribing, with a shorter time to concordant therapy and an increased proportion of patients receiving empiric therapy concordant with prior culture results. The use of unnecessary vancomycin was also reduced.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / Anti-Bacterial Agents Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Infect Dis Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / Anti-Bacterial Agents Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Infect Dis Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada