Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting the Development of Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.
Atwater, Brett D; Emerek, Kasper; Samad, Zainab; Sze, Edward; Black-Maier, Eric; Loring, Zak; Ugander, Martin; Liao, Lawrence; Kisslo, Joseph; Søgaard, Peter; Friedman, Daniel J.
Affiliation
  • Atwater BD; Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Fairfax, Virginia. Electronic address: brett.atwater@duke.edu.
  • Emerek K; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Samad Z; Department of Medicine, Aga Khan School of Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Sze E; Maine Health Partners, Portland, Maine.
  • Black-Maier E; Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Loring Z; Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Ugander M; Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Liao L; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham North Carolina.
  • Kisslo J; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham North Carolina.
  • Søgaard P; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Friedman DJ; Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven Connecticut.
Am J Cardiol ; 137: 39-44, 2020 12 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32998010
ABSTRACT
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) increases the likelihood of developing reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) but predicting which patients with LBBB and normal LVEF will develop decreased LVEF remains challenging. Fifty patients with LBBB and normal LVEF were retrospectively identified. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables were compared between patients who developed a decreased LVEF and those who did not. A total of 16 of 50 patients developed reduced LVEF after 4.3 (SD = 2.8) years of follow-up. Baseline patient and electrocardiographic variables were similar between patients who did and did not develop decreased LVEF. Baseline LVEF was lower in patients who developed decreased LVEF than in those who did not (51.9% [SD = 2.2%] vs 54.9% [SD = 4.4%], p <0.01). Diastolic filling time (DFT) accounted for a significantly smaller percentage of the cardiac cycle in patients who developed decreased LVEF than in those who did not (35.9%, [SD = 6.9%] vs 44.4% [SD = 4.5%] p <0.01). In univariable logistic regression, DFT had a C-statistic of 0.86 (p <0.0001) for prediction of development of decreased LVEF. In conclusion, patients in whom DFT accounted for <38% of the cardiac cycle had a relative risk of developing decreased LVEF of 7.0 (95% confidence interval 3.0 to 16.0) compared to patients with DFT accounting for ≥38% of the cardiac cycle.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stroke Volume / Bundle-Branch Block / Ventricular Function, Left / Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stroke Volume / Bundle-Branch Block / Ventricular Function, Left / Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 2020 Type: Article