Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic Evaluation of Factorial Trials: Cost-Utility Analysis of the Atorvastatin in Factorial With Omega EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes 2 × 2 × 2 Factorial Trial of Atorvastatin, Omega-3 Fish Oil, and Action Planning.
Dakin, Helen A; Farmer, Andrew; Gray, Alastair M; Holman, Rury R.
Affiliation
  • Dakin HA; Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK. Electronic address: helen.dakin@ndph.ox.ac.uk.
  • Farmer A; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
  • Gray AM; Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
  • Holman RR; Diabetes Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Value Health ; 23(10): 1340-1348, 2020 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032778
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We applied principles for conducting economic evaluations of factorial trials to a trial-based economic evaluation of a cluster-randomized 2 × 2 × 2 factorial trial. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin, omega-3 fish oil, and an action-planning leaflet, alone and in combination, from a UK National Health Service perspective.

METHODS:

The Atorvastatin in Factorial With Omega EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes (AFORRD) Trial randomized 800 patients with type 2 diabetes to atorvastatin, omega-3, or their respective placebos and randomized general practices to receive a leaflet-based action-planning intervention designed to improve compliance or standard care. The trial was conducted at 59 UK general practices. Sixteen-week outcomes for each trial participant were extrapolated for 70 years using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model v2.01. We analyzed the trial as a 2 × 2 factorial trial (ignoring interactions between action-planning leaflet and medication), as a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial trial (considering all interactions), and ignoring all interactions.

RESULTS:

We observed several qualitative interactions for costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) that changed treatment rankings. However, different approaches to analyzing the factorial design did not change the conclusions. There was a ≥99% chance that atorvastatin is cost-effective and omega-3 is not, at a £20 000/QALY threshold.

CONCLUSIONS:

Atorvastatin monotherapy was the most cost-effective combination of the 3 trial interventions at a £20 000/QALY threshold. Omega-3 fish oil was not cost-effective, while there was insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions about action planning. Recently-developed methods for analyzing factorial trials and combining parameter and sampling uncertainty were extended to estimate cost-effectiveness acceptability curves within a 2x2x2 factorial design with model-based extrapolation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fish Oils / Fatty Acids, Omega-3 / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Atorvastatin Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Value Health Journal subject: FARMACOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fish Oils / Fatty Acids, Omega-3 / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Atorvastatin Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Value Health Journal subject: FARMACOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article