Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does type of cancer affect ovarian response in oncofertility patients?
Hussein, Reda S; Zhao, Yulian; Khan, Zaraq.
Affiliation
  • Hussein RS; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. Electronic address: hussein.reda@mayo.edu.
  • Zhao Y; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Khan Z; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 50(6): 101944, 2021 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069914
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To evaluate the influence of type of cancer and cancer itself on the ovarian response during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for fertility preservation (FP). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This was a retrospective cohort study performed at a single academic tertiary-care infertility center. Women diagnosed with cancer who underwent COS with GnRH antagonist protocol between January 2009 and December 2018 were included in this study. Patients were categorized into three groups; breast/gynecologic, hematologic, and other cancers. We secondarily compared the COS parameters and ovarian reserve markers in oncofertility cases against non-cancer patients who pursued FP for deferred reproduction. The primary outcome was number of mature oocytes. Secondary outcomes included oocyte yield (number of retrieved oocytes/number of follicles aspirated at time of retrieval) and oocyte-maturity index, defined as number of mature oocytes/total oocytes retrieved.

RESULTS:

A total of 96 cancer patients were referred for FP counseling before starting their anti-cancer therapy. Clinical characteristics and ovarian response parameters were comparable between the three groups. Type of cancer was not a predictor for number of mature oocytes (p = 0.329), oocyte-maturity index (p = 0.815), or oocyte yield, (p = 0.161) after adjustment to cycle covariates. Moreover, cancer did not have impact on the number of mature oocytes (p = 0.699), oocyte-maturity index (p = 0.251) and oocyte yield (p = 0.094).

DISCUSSION:

There is no difference observed in outcomes of ovarian stimulation based on primary cancer diagnosis in oncofertility patients undergoing FP. Interestingly, no significant impact for cancer itself was observed on ovarian reserve or response to gonadotrophins stimulation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Oocytes / Ovulation Induction / Fertility Preservation / Ovarian Reserve / Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Oocytes / Ovulation Induction / Fertility Preservation / Ovarian Reserve / Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod Year: 2021 Type: Article