Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding Patients' Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market.
Murthy, Sreenivasa; Aneja, Pankaj; Asirvatham, Arthur Joseph; Husemoen, Lise Lotte N; Rhee, Nicolai A; Kesavadev, Jothydev.
Affiliation
  • Murthy S; LifeCare Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. drsreenivasamurthy@gmail.com.
  • Aneja P; Max Super Speciality Hospital, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi, India.
  • Asirvatham AJ; Arthur Asirvatham Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Husemoen LLN; Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
  • Rhee NA; Novo Nordisk Health Care AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kesavadev J; Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Pharmacoecon Open ; 5(2): 261-273, 2021 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33410093
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Our objective was to investigate willingness to pay (WTP) for biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India.

METHODS:

A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, preference study was conducted that assessed WTP for BIAsp 30 in an insulin pen (FlexPen® or Penfill® device) in patients in India with T2DM previously treated with biphasic human insulin (BHI) in vials and believed to be able to pay for treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients willing to continue to pay for BIAsp 30 after 12 weeks' treatment. Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline in treatment and device satisfaction and patient preferences for treatment attributes as assessed by a nested discrete-choice experiment.

RESULTS:

Overall, 54.9% (n = 277/505) of participants were male; the mean age was 56.4 years; diabetes duration was 10.9 years; 63.8% had a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2; > 75% had an annual household income > 150,000 Indian rupees (INR). After 12 weeks' treatment, 96.4% of patients were willing to pay for BIAsp 30. Mean treatment and device satisfaction significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.0001). Patients were willing to pay INR3576 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2755-4398) for improved glycemic control, INR688 (95% CI 383-994) for a device upgrade (vial/syringe to an insulin pen), or INR327 (95% CI 95-560) to avoid major hypoglycemia. Patients would need to be compensated INR44 (95% CI 56-32) per minor hypoglycemic event.

CONCLUSIONS:

In India, patients with T2DM previously treated with BHI were willing to pay for BIAsp 30 in an insulin pen. Furthermore, treatment and device satisfaction improved after this therapeutic switch. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03374774.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Pharmacoecon Open Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Pharmacoecon Open Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: India