Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of non-parametric T2 relaxometry methods for myelin water quantification.
Canales-Rodríguez, Erick Jorge; Pizzolato, Marco; Piredda, Gian Franco; Hilbert, Tom; Kunz, Nicolas; Pot, Caroline; Yu, Thomas; Salvador, Raymond; Pomarol-Clotet, Edith; Kober, Tobias; Thiran, Jean-Philippe; Daducci, Alessandro.
Affiliation
  • Canales-Rodríguez EJ; Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) , Barcelona, Spain; Signal Processing Lab (LTS5), École Po
  • Pizzolato M; Signal Processing Lab (LTS5), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Piredda GF; Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Signal Processing Lab (LTS5), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Hilbert T; Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Signal Processing Lab (LTS5), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Kunz N; Animal Imaging and Technology section, Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Pot C; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Neurology and Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Yu T; Signal Processing Lab (LTS5), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Medical Image Analysis Laboratory, Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Salvador R; FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) , Barcelona, Spain.
  • Pomarol-Clotet E; FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) , Barcelona, Spain.
  • Kober T; Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Signal Processing Lab (LTS5), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Thiran JP; Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Signal Processing Lab (LTS5), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Daducci A; Computer Science Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Med Image Anal ; 69: 101959, 2021 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33581618
ABSTRACT
Multi-component T2 relaxometry allows probing tissue microstructure by assessing compartment-specific T2 relaxation times and water fractions, including the myelin water fraction. Non-negative least squares (NNLS) with zero-order Tikhonov regularization is the conventional method for estimating smooth T2 distributions. Despite the improved estimation provided by this method compared to non-regularized NNLS, the solution is still sensitive to the underlying noise and the regularization weight. This is especially relevant for clinically achievable signal-to-noise ratios. In the literature of inverse problems, various well-established approaches to promote smooth solutions, including first-order and second-order Tikhonov regularization, and different criteria for estimating the regularization weight have been proposed, such as L-curve, Generalized Cross-Validation, and Chi-square residual fitting. However, quantitative comparisons between the available reconstruction methods for computing the T2 distribution, and between different approaches for selecting the optimal regularization weight, are lacking. In this study, we implemented and evaluated ten reconstruction algorithms, resulting from the individual combinations of three penalty terms with three criteria to estimate the regularization weight, plus non-regularized NNLS. Their performance was evaluated both in simulated data and real brain MRI data acquired from healthy volunteers through a scan-rescan repeatability analysis. Our findings demonstrate the need for regularization. As a result of this work, we provide a list of recommendations for selecting the optimal reconstruction algorithms based on the acquired data. Moreover, the implemented methods were packaged in a freely distributed toolbox to promote reproducible research, and to facilitate further research and the use of this promising quantitative technique in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water / Myelin Sheath Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med Image Anal Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water / Myelin Sheath Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med Image Anal Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2021 Type: Article