Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is nursing and midwifery clinical documentation a burden? An empirical study of perception versus reality.
Cooper, Alannah L; Brown, Janie A; Eccles, Siobhan P; Cooper, Narelle; Albrecht, Matthew A.
Affiliation
  • Cooper AL; St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia.
  • Brown JA; School of Nursing Midwifery & Paramedicine, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
  • Eccles SP; St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia.
  • Cooper N; St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia.
  • Albrecht MA; St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia.
J Clin Nurs ; 30(11-12): 1645-1652, 2021 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590554
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To measure time spent on clinical documentation and nurses and midwives' perceptions of this aspect of their role. BACKGROUND: Nurses and midwives rely on accurate documentation when planning care. However, documenting and communicating care can be onerous, time-consuming and at times duplicated or redundant. While documentation provides a record and means of communicating care, it should not detract from the delivery of care. DESIGN: An observational time and motion study and survey design reported using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. METHODS: The study was conducted with Western Australian nurses and midwives working in a private not-for-profit hospital from July-October 2019. An observational study was undertaken to measure the practice of documentation on each shift. Participants' perceptions of clinical documentation were measured using a self-report survey. RESULTS: A total of 120 hr of observation were undertaken. Total observed time spent on documentation was 28.1% on morning shifts, 22.7% on afternoon shifts and 20.9% on night duty. The mean self-reported time for clinical documentation was 50.4% on morning shifts, 40.7% on afternoon shifts and 37.9% on night duty. Issues with duplication and unnecessary paperwork were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants tended to overestimate time spent on documentation, it still consumed a significant proportion of time. Frustrations with paperwork may amplify nurses' negative perceptions of documentation. Clinical documentation needs to be reviewed, revised and reduced to release time back to direct patient care and reduce clinician dissatisfaction. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinical documentation is required in all areas of clinical practice and forms an important legal record. Understanding the demands of clinical documentation can assist in reviewing and improving documentation to release time back to direct patient care.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Midwifery Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: J Clin Nurs Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Midwifery Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: J Clin Nurs Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia