Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The asymmetry of antimatter in the proton.
Dove, J; Kerns, B; McClellan, R E; Miyasaka, S; Morton, D H; Nagai, K; Prasad, S; Sanftl, F; Scott, M B C; Tadepalli, A S; Aidala, C A; Arrington, J; Ayuso, C; Barker, C L; Brown, C N; Chang, W C; Chen, A; Christian, D C; Dannowitz, B P; Daugherity, M; Diefenthaler, M; El Fassi, L; Geesaman, D F; Gilman, R; Goto, Y; Guo, L; Guo, R; Hague, T J; Holt, R J; Isenhower, D; Kinney, E R; Kitts, N; Klein, A; Kleinjan, D W; Kudo, Y; Leung, C; Lin, P-J; Liu, K; Liu, M X; Lorenzon, W; Makins, N C R; de Medeiros, M Mesquita; McGaughey, P L; Miyachi, Y; Mooney, I; Nakahara, K; Nakano, K; Nara, S; Peng, J-C; Puckett, A J.
Affiliation
  • Dove J; Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Kerns B; Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • McClellan RE; Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Miyasaka S; Experimental Nuclear Physics Division, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA, USA.
  • Morton DH; Department of Physics, School of Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nagai K; Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Prasad S; Department of Physics, School of Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sanftl F; Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Scott MBC; Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Tadepalli AS; Department of Physics, School of Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Aidala CA; Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Arrington J; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
  • Ayuso C; Experimental Nuclear Physics Division, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA, USA.
  • Barker CL; Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Brown CN; Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
  • Chang WC; Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA.
  • Chen A; Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Christian DC; Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Dannowitz BP; Department of Physics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA.
  • Daugherity M; Department of Engineering and Physics, Abilene Christian University, Abilene, TX, USA.
  • Diefenthaler M; Accelerator Division, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, USA.
  • El Fassi L; Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Geesaman DF; Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Gilman R; Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Goto Y; Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Guo L; Particle Physics Division, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, USA.
  • Guo R; Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Hague TJ; Department of Engineering and Physics, Abilene Christian University, Abilene, TX, USA.
  • Holt RJ; Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Isenhower D; Experimental Nuclear Physics Division, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA, USA.
  • Kinney ER; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
  • Kitts N; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA.
  • Klein A; Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA.
  • Kleinjan DW; Global Empire LLC, Lemont, IL, USA.
  • Kudo Y; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
  • Leung C; RIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, Wako, Japan.
  • Lin PJ; Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
  • Liu K; Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Liu MX; Department of Physics, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Lorenzon W; Department of Engineering and Physics, Abilene Christian University, Abilene, TX, USA.
  • Makins NCR; Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA.
  • de Medeiros MM; Kellogg Radiation Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • McGaughey PL; Department of Engineering and Physics, Abilene Christian University, Abilene, TX, USA.
  • Miyachi Y; Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Mooney I; Department of Engineering and Physics, Abilene Christian University, Abilene, TX, USA.
  • Nakahara K; Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
  • Nakano K; Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
  • Nara S; Department of Physics, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
  • Peng JC; Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Puckett AJ; Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Nature ; 590(7847): 561-565, 2021 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33627814
ABSTRACT
The fundamental building blocks of the proton-quarks and gluons-have been known for decades. However, we still have an incomplete theoretical and experimental understanding of how these particles and their dynamics give rise to the quantum bound state of the proton and its physical properties, such as its spin1. The two up quarks and the single down quark that comprise the proton in the simplest picture account only for a few per cent of the proton mass, the bulk of which is in the form of quark kinetic and potential energy and gluon energy from the strong force2. An essential feature of this force, as described by quantum chromodynamics, is its ability to create matter-antimatter quark pairs inside the proton that exist only for a very short time. Their fleeting existence makes the antimatter quarks within protons difficult to study, but their existence is discernible in reactions in which a matter-antimatter quark pair annihilates. In this picture of quark-antiquark creation by the strong force, the probability distributions as a function of momentum for the presence of up and down antimatter quarks should be nearly identical, given that their masses are very similar and small compared to the mass of the proton3. Here we provide evidence from muon pair production measurements that these distributions are considerably different, with more abundant down antimatter quarks than up antimatter quarks over a wide range of momenta. These results are expected to revive interest in several proposed mechanisms for the origin of this antimatter asymmetry in the proton that had been disfavoured by previous results4, and point to future measurements that can distinguish between these mechanisms.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Nature Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Nature Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States