Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medical Versus Surgical Treatment for the Management of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review.
Tardáguila-García, Aroa; Sanz-Corbalán, Irene; García-Alamino, Josep M; Ahluwalia, Raju; Uccioli, Luigi; Lázaro-Martínez, José Luis.
Affiliation
  • Tardáguila-García A; Diabetic Foot Unit, Clínica Universitaria de Podología, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
  • Sanz-Corbalán I; Diabetic Foot Unit, Clínica Universitaria de Podología, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
  • García-Alamino JM; GhenderS Research Group, Universidad Blanquerna-Ramon Llull, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Ahluwalia R; Department of Orthopedics, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Uccioli L; Department of Systems Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
  • Lázaro-Martínez JL; Diabetic Foot Unit, Clínica Universitaria de Podología, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Med ; 10(6)2021 Mar 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33802685
A systematic review and quality assessment was performed to assess the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis by medical or surgical treatment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used. All selected studies were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to assess the risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. The literature was revised using PubMed (Medline) and Embase (Elsevier) up to September 2020 to identify clinical trials assessing medical or surgical treatment to manage diabetic foot osteomyelitis. A total of six clinical trials that met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 308 participants. Healing rate, complete closure of the wound, and type of complications were the outcomes evaluated. Risk of bias assessment showed that only two of the six clinical trials included in the systematic review had a low risk of bias. Based on our findings, we believe that the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis remains challenging. There are few high-quality clinical trials that both stratify clinical presentations and compare these treatments. We conclude that the available evidence is insufficient to identify the best option to cure diabetic foot osteomyelitis.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Spain

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Spain