Sex differences in left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony and outcomes with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Heart Rhythm O2
; 1(4): 243-249, 2020 Oct.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34113878
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Women seem to derive more benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than men, even after accounting for the higher burden of risk factors for nonresponse often observed in men.OBJECTIVE:
To assess for sex-specific differences in left ventricular (LV) electrical dyssynchrony as a contributing electrophysiological explanation for the greater degree of CRT benefit among women.METHODS:
We compared the extent of baseline LV electrical dyssynchrony, as measured by the QRS area (QRSA), among men and women with left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing CRT at Duke University (n = 492, 35% women) overall and in relation to baseline QRS characteristics using independent sample t tests and Pearson correlation coefficients. Cox regression analyses were used to relate sex, QRSA, and QRS characteristics to the risk of cardiac transplantation, LV assist device implant, or death.RESULTS:
Although the mean QRS duration (QRSd) did not differ by sex, QRSA was greater for women vs men (113.8 µVs vs 98.2 µVs, P < .001), owing to differences in the QRSd <150 ms subgroup (92.3 ± 28.7 µVs vs 67.6 ± 26.2 µVs, P < .001). Among those with nonstrict LBBB, mean QRSd was similar but QRSA was significantly greater among women than men (96.0 ± 25.0 µVs vs 63.6 ± 26.2 µVs, P < .001). QRSA was similar among men and women with strict LBBB (P = .533). Female sex was associated with better long-term outcomes in an unadjusted model (hazard ratio 0.623, confidence interval 0.454-0.857, P = .004) but sex no longer predicted outcomes after accounting for differences in QRSA.CONCLUSIONS:
Our study suggests that sex-specific differences in LV dyssynchrony contribute to greater CRT benefit among women. Standard QRSd and morphology assessments seem to underestimate the extent of LV electrical dyssynchrony among women with LBBB.
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Type of study:
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Language:
En
Journal:
Heart Rhythm O2
Year:
2020
Type:
Article