Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Serum Proteomics and Plasma Fibulin-3 in Differentiation of Mesothelioma From Asbestos-Exposed Controls and Patients With Other Pleural Diseases.
Tsim, Selina; Alexander, Laura; Kelly, Caroline; Shaw, Ann; Hinsley, Samantha; Clark, Stephen; Evison, Matthew; Holme, Jayne; Cameron, Euan J; Sharma, Davand; Wright, Angela; Grundy, Seamus; Grieve, Douglas; Ionescu, Alina; Breen, David P; Paramasivam, Elankumaran; Psallidas, Ioannis; Mukherjee, Dipak; Chetty, Mahendran; Cox, Giles; Hart-Thomas, Alan; Naseer, Rehan; Edwards, John; Daneshvar, Cyrus; Panchal, Rakesh; Munavvar, Mohammed; Ostroff, Rachel; Alexander, Leigh; Hall, Holly; Neilson, Matthew; Miller, Crispin; McCormick, Carol; Thomson, Fiona; Chalmers, Anthony J; Maskell, Nick A; Blyth, Kevin G.
Affiliation
  • Tsim S; Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Alexander L; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Kelly C; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Shaw A; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Hinsley S; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Clark S; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Evison M; Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Holme J; Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Cameron EJ; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, United Kingdom.
  • Sharma D; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock, United Kingdom.
  • Wright A; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Grundy S; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom.
  • Grieve D; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, United Kingdom.
  • Ionescu A; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, United Kingdom.
  • Breen DP; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
  • Paramasivam E; Department of Respiratory Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Psallidas I; Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Mukherjee D; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Basildon University Hospital, Basildon, United Kingdom.
  • Chetty M; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • Cox G; Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's Mill Hospital, Sutton-in-Ashfield, United Kingdom.
  • Hart-Thomas A; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
  • Naseer R; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
  • Edwards J; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Daneshvar C; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
  • Panchal R; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
  • Munavvar M; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom.
  • Ostroff R; SomaLogic Inc., Boulder, Colorado.
  • Alexander L; SomaLogic Inc., Boulder, Colorado.
  • Hall H; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Neilson M; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Miller C; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • McCormick C; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Thomson F; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Chalmers AJ; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Maskell NA; Academic Respiratory Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Blyth KG; Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kevin.blyth@glasgow.ac.uk.
J Thorac Oncol ; 16(10): 1705-1717, 2021 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34116230
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is difficult to diagnose. An accurate blood biomarker could prompt specialist referral or be deployed in future screening. In earlier retrospective studies, SOMAscan proteomics (Somalogic, Boulder, CO) and fibulin-3 seemed highly accurate, but SOMAscan has not been validated prospectively and subsequent fibulin-3 data have been contradictory.

METHODS:

A multicenter prospective observational study was performed in 22 centers, generating a large intention-to-diagnose cohort. Blood sampling, processing, and diagnostic assessment were standardized, including a 1-year follow-up. Plasma fibulin-3 was measured using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (CloudClone [used in previous studies] and BosterBio, Pleasanton, CA). Serum proteomics was measured using the SOMAscan assay. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity at 95% specificity, area under the curve [AUC]) was benchmarked against serum mesothelin (Mesomark, Fujirebio Diagnostics, Malvern, PA). Biomarkers were correlated against primary tumor volume, inflammatory markers, and asbestos exposure.

RESULTS:

A total of 638 patients with suspected pleural malignancy (SPM) and 110 asbestos-exposed controls (AECs) were recruited. SOMAscan reliably differentiated MPM from AECs (75% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, validation cohort AUC 0.855) but was not useful in patients with differentiating non-MPM SPM. Fibulin-3 (by BosterBio after failed CloudClone validation) revealed 7.4% and 11.9% sensitivity at 95% specificity in MPM versus non-MPM SPM and AECs, respectively (associated AUCs 0.611 [0.557-0.664], p = 0.0015) and 0.516 [0.443-0.589], p = 0.671), both inferior to mesothelin. SOMAscan proteins correlated with inflammatory markers but not with asbestos exposure. Neither biomarker correlated with tumor volume.

CONCLUSIONS:

SOMAscan may prove useful as a future screening test for MPM in asbestos-exposed persons. Neither fibulin-3 nor SOMAscan should be used for diagnosis or pathway stratification.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pleural Neoplasms / Asbestos / Lung Neoplasms / Mesothelioma Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Thorac Oncol Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pleural Neoplasms / Asbestos / Lung Neoplasms / Mesothelioma Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Thorac Oncol Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom