Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations.
Clausen, Frederik Banch; Hellberg, Åsa; Bein, Gregor; Bugert, Peter; Schwartz, Dieter; Drnovsek, Tadeja Dovc; Finning, Kirstin; Guz, Katarzyna; Haimila, Katri; Henny, Christine; O'Brien, Helen; Orzinska, Agnieszka; Sørensen, Kirsten; Thorlacius, Steinunn; Wikman, Agneta; Denomme, Gregory Andrew; Flegel, Willy Albert; Gassner, Christoph; de Haas, Masja; Hyland, Catherine; Ji, Yanli; Lane, William J; Nogués, Núria; Olsson, Martin L; Peyrard, Thierry; van der Schoot, C Ellen; Weinstock, Christof; Legler, Tobias.
Affiliation
  • Clausen FB; Laboratory of Blood Genetics, Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hellberg Å; cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bein G; cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bugert P; Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Sweden.
  • Schwartz D; Institute for Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
  • Drnovsek TD; Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty Mannheim, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden Württemberg - Hessen, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Finning K; Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Guz K; Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Haimila K; National Health Service Blood and Transplant, International Blood Group Reference Laboratory, UK.
  • Henny C; Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
  • O'Brien H; Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Orzinska A; Interregional Blood Transfusion SRC, Berne, Switzerland.
  • Sørensen K; Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Thorlacius S; Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Wikman A; Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Denomme GA; The Blood Bank, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Flegel WA; Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Karolinska University Hospital and CLINTEC Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Gassner C; cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Haas M; Versiti Blood Research Institute and Diagnostic Laboratories, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Hyland C; cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ji Y; Department of Transfusion Medicine, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Lane WJ; cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Nogués N; Institute for Translational Medicine, Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein.
  • Olsson ML; cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Peyrard T; Department of Immunohaematology Diagnostic Services, Sanquin Diagnostic Services and Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Schoot CE; Department of Haematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Weinstock C; cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Legler T; Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Brisbane, Australia.
Vox Sang ; 117(2): 157-165, 2022 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34155647
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors. RESULTS: In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed. CONCLUSION: These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Group Antigens Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Vox Sang Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Group Antigens Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Vox Sang Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark