Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term follow-up of late maxillary orthopedic advancement with the Liou-Alternate rapid maxillary expansion-constriction technique in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Meazzini, Maria Costanza; Torre, Camilla; Cappello, Alessandro; Tintinelli, Roberto; De Ponti, Elena; Mazzoleni, Fabio.
Affiliation
  • Meazzini MC; University of Milan, Smile House, Regional Center for CLP, Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, Milan and Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy. Electronic address: cmeazzini@yahoo.it.
  • Torre C; Private practice, Milan, Italy.
  • Cappello A; Private practice, Milan, Italy.
  • Tintinelli R; Private practice, Milan, Italy.
  • De Ponti E; Medical Physics Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
  • Mazzoleni F; Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 160(2): 221-230, 2021 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183222
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The objective of this study was to evaluate short and long-term results of the application of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion/constriction (Alt-RAMEC) technique in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

METHODS:

Forty-two white patients were consecutively treated with the Alt-RAMEC technique. The average age of the patients was 12.7 ± 1.6 years (range, 9.4-15.9 years) before protraction. The average age at long-term follow-up was 19.4 ± 2.8 years (range, 17.2-26.9 years). A sample of nontreated patients with Class III malocclusion from the archives of orthognatic surgery in our hospital was used as a control group. The initial records were matched for sex, the severity of Class III malocclusion, and age (mean, 12.1 ± 1.4 years; range, 9.7-14.1 years) with the old records available in the archive. The control sample had records presurgery (mean, 19.8 ± 2.2 years; range, 16.6-21.6 years).

RESULTS:

The sagittal advancement of A-point, after the application of the technique, was 5.43 ± 2.71 mm. Some mandibular dentoalveolar adaptation was noted. The position of the maxilla was stable in the long term. In contrast, the control group showed limited growth at the maxillary level during the long-term follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results showed that the Alt-RAMEC technique, performed at the correct time, with a double-hinged expander, followed by Class III spring or elastic traction, 24 h/d, allows for satisfactory maxillary protraction, with stable long-term results. The comparison with a sample of matched nontreated patients with Class III malocclusion allowed to suggest the positive effect of the treatment on the maxillary position vs the natural evolution of the Class III skeletal discrepancy.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palatal Expansion Technique / Malocclusion, Angle Class III Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palatal Expansion Technique / Malocclusion, Angle Class III Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Year: 2021 Type: Article