Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychological factors associated with headache frequency, intensity, and headache-related disability in migraine patients.
Klonowski, Theresa; Kropp, Peter; Straube, Andreas; Ruscheweyh, Ruth.
Affiliation
  • Klonowski T; Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany. Theresa.Klonowski@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  • Kropp P; Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Straube A; Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
  • Ruscheweyh R; Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Neurol Sci ; 43(2): 1255-1266, 2022 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34304327
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Several psychological cofactors of migraine have been identified, but relationships to different headache parameters (e.g., headache frequency vs. headache-related disability) are only incompletely understood.

METHODS:

We cross-sectionally assessed 279 migraine patients at their first presentation at our tertiary headache center. We obtained headache and acute medication frequency, pain intensity, the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), and the Pain Disability Index (PDI) as headache-related outcomes as well as scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain-Related Control Scale (PRCS), and Avoidance Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ) as psychological factors.

RESULTS:

Linear regression models revealed the highest associations of the psychological factors with the PDI (adjusted R2 = 0.296, p < 0.001, independent predictors PCS, AEQ social avoidance, depression) followed by the MIDAS (adjusted R2 = 0.137, p < 0.001, predictors depression, AEQ social avoidance) and headache frequency (adjusted R2 = 0.083, p < 0.001, predictors depression, AEQ humor/distraction). Principal component analysis corroborated that psychological factors were preferentially associated with the PDI, while the MIDAS loaded together with headache frequency.

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that psychological factors are more strongly associated with the subjective degree of headache-related disability measured by the PDI than with the days with disability (MIDAS) or the more objective parameter of headache frequency. This once again highlights the need for comprehensive assessment of migraine patients with different headache parameters and the need for considering psychological treatment, especially in patients with high disability.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disabled Persons / Migraine Disorders Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neurol Sci Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disabled Persons / Migraine Disorders Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neurol Sci Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany