Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire: Psychometric Performance and Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Patient-Reported Symptom Measure.
Bushnell, Donald M; Atkinson, Thomas M; McCarrier, Kelly P; Liepa, Astra M; DeBusk, Kendra P; Coons, Stephen Joel.
Affiliation
  • Bushnell DM; Patient-Centered Research, Evidera, Seattle, Washington.
  • Atkinson TM; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Community-Engagement, and Language Core Facility, New York, New York.
  • McCarrier KP; Pharmerit International, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Liepa AM; Eli Lilly and Company, Global Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • DeBusk KP; Seattle Genetics, Global HEOR, Bothell, Washington.
  • Coons SJ; Critical Path Institute, Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium, Tucson, Arizona.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp ; 95: 100642, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34567289
BACKGROUND: The Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ) was developed to incorporate the patient's perspective into evaluation of clinical benefit in advanced non-small cell lung cancer trials and meet regulatory expectations for doing so. Qualitative evidence supported 7 items covering 5 symptom concepts. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated measurement properties of the NSCLC-SAQ's items, overall scale, and total score. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional study, a purposive sample of patients with clinician-diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer, initiating or undergoing treatment, provided sociodemographic information and completed the NSCLC-SAQ, National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lung Symptom Index (FLSI-17), and a Patient Global Impression of Severity item. Rasch analyses, factor analyses, and assessments of construct validity and reliability were completed. RESULTS: The 152 participants had a mean age of 64 years, 57% were women, and 87% where White. The majority were Stage IV (83%), 51% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (32% performance status 0 and 17% performance status 2), and 33% were treatment naïve. Rasch analyses showed ordered thresholds for response options. Factor analyses demonstrated that items could be combined for a total score. Internal consistency (Cronbach  α = 0.78) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.87) were quite satisfactory. NSCLC-SAQ total score correlation was 0.83 with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lung Symptom Index-17. The NSCLC-SAQ was able to differentiate between symptom severity levels and performance status (both P values < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The NSCLC-SAQ generated highly reliable scores with substantial evidence of construct validity. The Food and Drug Administration's qualification supports the NSCLC-SAQ as a measure of symptoms in drug development. Further evaluation is needed on its longitudinal measurement properties and interepretation of meaningful within-patient score change. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021; 82:XXX-XXX).
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Curr Ther Res Clin Exp Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Curr Ther Res Clin Exp Year: 2021 Type: Article