Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and meta-analysis of effects of psychosocial interventions on spiritual well-being in adults with cancer.
McLouth, Laurie E; Ford, C Graham; Pustejovsky, James E; Park, Crystal L; Sherman, Allen C; Trevino, Kelly; Salsman, John M.
Affiliation
  • McLouth LE; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Ford CG; Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
  • Pustejovsky JE; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Park CL; Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
  • Sherman AC; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • Trevino K; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York City, New York, USA.
  • Salsman JM; Wake Forest School of Medicine and the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Psychooncology ; 30(2): 147-158, 2021 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34602807
Objective: Spiritual well-being (SpWb) is an important dimension of health-related quality of life for many cancer patients. Accordingly, an increasing number of psychosocial intervention studies have included SpWb as a study endpoint, and may improve SpWb even if not designed explicitly to do so. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated effects of psychosocial interventions on SpWb in adults with cancer and tested potential moderators of intervention effects. Methods: Six literature databases were systematically searched to identify RCTs of psychosocial interventions in which SpWb was an outcome. Doctoral-level rater pairs extracted data using Covidence following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Standard meta-analytic techniques were applied, including meta-regression with robust variance estimation and risk-of-bias sensitivity analysis. Results: Forty-one RCTs were identified, encompassing 88 treatment effects among 3883 survivors. Interventions were associated with significant improvements in SpWb (g = 0.22, 95% CI [0.14, 0.29], p < 0.0001). Studies assessing the FACIT-Sp demonstrated larger effect sizes than did those using other measures of SpWb (g = 0.25, 95% CI [0.17, 0.34], vs. g = 0.10, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.23], p = 0.03]. No other intervention, clinical, or demographic characteristics significantly moderated effect size. Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions are associated with small-to-medium-sized effects on SpWb among cancer survivors. Future research should focus on conceptually coherent interventions explicitly targeting SpWb and evaluate interventions in samples that are diverse with respect to race and ethnicity, sex and cancer type.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cancer Survivors / Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Psychooncology Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cancer Survivors / Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Psychooncology Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States